We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Vent: Screen shapes/site shapes

124»

Comments

  • JReacher1 wrote: »
    On the troll comment it makes me laugh when you deliberately altered my first post to make out I posted something I didnt.
    For goodness sake, stop bleating on about major devices. It's a red herring and more than one poster has explained to you very clearly why it's a red herring. You're just being an annoying troll now.
    I worry this thread will end up like last time when you deleted all your posts and pm'd me an apology ;)

    Something I suspect happened in your fervid imagination rather than in real life. :D
  • JReacher1
    JReacher1 Posts: 4,663 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper I've been Money Tipped!
    For goodness sake, stop bleating on about major devices. It's a red herring and more than one poster has explained to you very clearly why it's a red herring. You're just being an annoying troll now.



    Something I suspect happened in your fervid imagination rather than in real life. :D

    If my statement about major devices was a red herring then all websites would function the same on all devices. As they don't then my statement is true....
  • bod1467
    bod1467 Posts: 15,214 Forumite
    JReacher1 wrote: »
    Screen size does make a difference but the browser is more as important than as screen size.

    Exactly (with that minor correction) ... that's why most site designers will test as many permutations as they reasonably can, but it's impossible to test everything. As such, your comment about major devices is correct.
  • Got to admit I agree with what another poster has said. Basically I've no idea what the op is on about and have ever had this problem. On a PC adjust the size of your browser and then the text to suit you using the + & - buttons whilst holding the control key. On mobile devices again just zoom until your happy with the size of the text.
  • Ectophile
    Ectophile Posts: 8,047 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Got to admit I agree with what another poster has said. Basically I've no idea what the op is on about and have ever had this problem. On a PC adjust the size of your browser and then the text to suit you using the + & - buttons whilst holding the control key. On mobile devices again just zoom until your happy with the size of the text.

    I understand well what the OP is on about, and to be honest I'm baffled at why so many people don't get it :wall:. Computers these days often have very wide, and fairly short screens. Yet some web designers think their web sites should have a narrow fixed width when displayed on the screen, with big empty borders each side if the screen is wider. The end result is a stupid little block of text in the middle of your screen that you have to keep scrolling up and down to read the article(s).

    Re-sizing the font is irrelevant - it's not about whether or not the font is big enough to read. Re-sizing the browser window doesn't help in the slightest. You could make the browser narrower, and look at whatever wallpaper you have your the screen instead of the big borders, but that still doesn't do anything to actually use all that screen real-estate that's sitting idle.

    The problem is the web designers who think that they know best how to format everything on the screen, despite the huge range of screens (including tablets) that people are now using.
    If it sticks, force it.
    If it breaks, well it wasn't working right anyway.
  • artbaron
    artbaron Posts: 7,285 Forumite
    Ectophile wrote: »
    I understand well what the OP is on about, and to be honest I'm baffled at why so many people don't get it :wall:. Computers these days often have very wide, and fairly short screens. ... the end result is a stupid little block of text in the middle of your screen that you have to keep scrolling up and down to read the article(s).

    What difference does the width of the monitor make if you're concerned with how much content you can fit vertically? A monitor with a vertical res of 1200 will have 1200 pixels vertically whether it's 1600 wide or 1900 wide or a mile and a half wide. Makes no sense.
  • Ectophile wrote: »
    with big empty borders each side if the screen is wider. The end result is a stupid little block of text in the middle of your screen that you have to keep scrolling up and down to read the article(s).


    But holding the Ctrl button and pressing + or - gets rid of it so I don't see the problem.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.