We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Before your first post, read this....
Options
Comments
-
rescued from page 20
-
After reading PtL Vaubans Guide , please don't desert us, hang around and help others!
Hi, we’ve had to remove part of your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
Found this slightly shredded document on page 2.After reading PtL Vaubans Guide , please don't desert us, hang around and help others!
Hi, we’ve had to remove part of your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
Found on Page 2 again.0
-
ya beat me to it.....If you're new. read The FAQ and Vauban's Guide
The alleged Ringleader.........0 -
As Thomson's "default position" seems to be blaming every technical problem as a "hidden manufacturing defect" do you think it would be a good idea to update the guide.
My own view for what it's worth is this defence isn't worth powder and shot because:
1. If there is a manufacturing defect, hidden or not, the airline will have raised a complaint with the manufacturer, and as such there will be substantial correspondence. It is all disclosable.
2. It is likely to apply to more than one aircraft of the same design so there will be correspondence between the manufacturer and all airlines flying this type of aircraft. Product recall perhaps?
3. I am not convinced that even if there is a genuine case of a hidden manufacturing defect, this is sufficient to override Huzar.
4. The airline will be entitled to compensation from the manufacturer including an indemnity against passenger claims.
In short, I suspect that the whole thing is a scam on Thomson's part.
JJ0 -
This is my recent posting on hidden defects...
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/68052339#Comment_68052339
But I do happen to know of someone who recently got paid out by Thomson, without having to go the court route, so it's not necessarily a default position adopted by them.0 -
hi guys in september our flight coming home was 4 hours late due to there being a technical fault with the plane and then having to wait for a mechanic to come to the airport from the other side of the island, therefore we arived back to the airport 4 hours late, I used the teplate letter from this website and filled it in and sent it to thompson, they replyed just saying sorry and to just get intouch with my insurance company, is there correct do i need to now get intoch with them or is there someone else i can go to? thanks0
-
ktcoil - read Vauban's guide - likely that you have a valid claim.0
-
rescued from page 30
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards