We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Insurance question

1234568

Comments

  • DUTR
    DUTR Posts: 12,958 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    rs65 wrote: »
    That's where your belief is wrong. B didn't cause the damage.

    Still harbouring on the word WRONG?
    Read my post again , did I say B had done anything wrong?
  • rs65
    rs65 Posts: 5,682 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    DUTR wrote: »
    Still harbouring on the word WRONG?
    Read my post again , did I say B had done anything wrong?

    You said B caused the damage. B didn't cause the damage.
  • DUTR
    DUTR Posts: 12,958 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    rs65 wrote: »
    You said B caused the damage. B didn't cause the damage.

    Which post was that?
  • rs65
    rs65 Posts: 5,682 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    DUTR wrote: »
    Which post was that?

    Post #68 .
  • DUTR
    DUTR Posts: 12,958 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    rs65 wrote: »
    Post #68 .

    Post #68 is authored by Dacouch, just admit it it, I never said what you were accusing me of, and stand corrected, however no one can dispute if you believe that is what you thought I said as you are entitled to believe what you want to believe.
  • rs65
    rs65 Posts: 5,682 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    DUTR wrote: »
    Post #68 is authored by Dacouch, just admit it it, I never said what you were accusing me of, and stand corrected, however no one can dispute if you believe that is what you thought I said as you are entitled to believe what you want to believe.

    Post #68 was authored by DUTR at 6.45pm.
  • dacouch
    dacouch Posts: 21,636 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 11 February 2015 at 9:34PM
    rs65 wrote: »
    Post #68 .

    Or

    The highlighted part is deliciously ironic...
    DUTR wrote: »
    The correct path is as Car54 and myself explained, what many of you seem to forget is that claims are dealt with on fact and logic not empathy and emotion.
    The driver of the car collided with a vehicle and technically should furninsh their details to the owner/keeper.

    I agree ultimately their own insurance will more than likely re-imburse both parties .

    I love this post in response to one of your posts as well, he could not have chosen a better example to actually disprove his own point.
    DUTR wrote: »
    We can all think as we like as for all but the OP, the question is hypothetical, I guess that the car where the handbrake fails as it has no driver the insurers for that car are also not liable? According to your logic.

    There is no hinderance in any of the replies, the OP will have to sort it via his insurer, as you can see from the thread there is more than one path to success.
    As for the multiple, each insurer bears their own loss not just the insurer of the rear most vehicle in the pile up.
  • DUTR
    DUTR Posts: 12,958 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 11 February 2015 at 9:38PM
    rs65 wrote: »
    Post #68 was authored by DUTR at 6.45pm.

    A post has since been deleted then as post #68 when I replied to your post was authored by Dacouch, let me just have a look now.

    Just checked and I wrote
    There is nothing to correct, trouble is you are all trying to change what I believe the process may flow,
    Let me repeat
    A drives into B B collides with C, C will lodge the initial claim against B and B will lodge a claim against A, C's claim will get forwarded to A's insurer via B. B's record will show claim notified and resolved.
    Time will tell how it revolve's if the OP cares to update us.

    That is not wrong it's what I beleive and all the posts on the forum are not going to change that. No one is asking you or anyone to agree with my thoughts on the topic. We can't pretend to live in a world where everyone shares the same views on a particular topic.
  • dacouch
    dacouch Posts: 21,636 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    RS means this part of post 68...
    DUTR wrote: »

    As said I don't mind a debate, but if you want to discuss you are right and anyone that disagrees with you is wrong then there is no point entertaining that conversation, why would the incident even get to court? He simply puts what happened which was property insured by B has caused damage to his property.
  • DUTR
    DUTR Posts: 12,958 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    dacouch wrote: »
    RS means this part of post 68...

    As replied to your earlier post dacouch As said I don't mind a debate, but if you want to discuss you are right and anyone that disagrees with you is wrong then there is no point entertaining that conversation.
    I probably also imagined incorrectly that you are braodminded enough to accept that somebody else may have a different viewpoint to yours.
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.
Update Your Picture