We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Better Buy Gold

123578

Comments

  • Gadfium
    Gadfium Posts: 763 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    pop_gun wrote: »
    BIB

    We know gold is scarce because countries like Germany have requested their gold be repatriated from the U.S. Only to be told it would take 7 years for the request to be completed.
    We also know gold manipulation has been going on for decades. When Gordon Brown sold 400 tonnes of UK gold he announced it to the markets before hand. This resulted in the price of gold hitting a 20 year low. You and I wouldn't intentionally sell something hoping to get the least amount for it. But Gordon Brown did, and he did so to keep the price of gold from going up.
    A high gold price reflects the inherent folly of a fiat monetary system.
    It stands to reason if gold is scarce and has no viable alternative, then the price must rise. The fact is the fundamentals for gold are the same now as they were at it's peak in 2011. The only way the gold price should fall, is if the commodities market had been supplied with more gold a la Gordon Brown's 'get 'em cheap' gold sale. Real gold supply wasn't available, but paper gold in the form of ETFs were.
    The amount of fake gold contracts could be increased and used to manipulate the real price of gold.

    The stock market can't be relied upon when it allows things to be traded that don't actually exist.

    alex.jpg?resize=480%2C266
  • pop_gun wrote: »
    Your claim the FTSE would return 70% on it's worse trading day is supposing we all had a crystal ball and knew which stocks and shares would outperform the market on said day. If I had a crystal ball wouldn't it be better to get the winning lottery numbers?

    I think you have missed the point JimJames was making.

    If you

    1) had bought all the shares in the FTSE100 on the index's very most expensive day in history in 1999

    and

    2) held on to them ever since, reinvesting all the dividends you were paid

    and

    3) done nothing else

    then

    4) your investments would now be worth about 70% more than they were initially - even though the index is lower than it was at the start

    Ta-da
  • pop_gun
    pop_gun Posts: 372 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 28 January 2015 at 10:38AM
    jimjames wrote: »
    Amongst all the froth about stock markets and headlines about index up or down what seems to be forgotten is that you're buying part of that business.

    Unlike gold, companies want to make a profit and grow, that then feeds through to their owners over time. Yes there's a risk the company might fail but ultimately understanding what a share is would help people and their perception of stock markets.


    BIB

    Why do people's perception of the stock market need to change?

    Haven't enough investors lost their entire savings and a large part of their pensions to the stock market already?

    All of them were looking for modest returns, yet ended up lining some else's pocket.

    There are no more easy marks, JJ.
  • DiggerUK
    DiggerUK Posts: 4,992 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I think you have missed the point JimJames was making...............

    No, pop_corn has not missed the point, pc is a conspiracy nut. Talking common sense to such jokers is a waste of time.
    ..._
  • gadgetmind
    gadgetmind Posts: 11,130 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    pop_gun wrote: »
    Haven't enough investors lost their entire savings and a large part of their pensions to the stock market?

    How, exactly, did they manage to do that?

    I've been investing into (mainly) equities since the late 80s, and my shirt is fully intact.
    I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.

    Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.
  • gadgetmind
    gadgetmind Posts: 11,130 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    4) your investments would now be worth about 70% more than they were initially - even though the index is lower than it was at the start

    Here are the numbers.

    Dec30 1999, FTSE 100=6930, FTSE 100 TR=3141 * (Dot com crash high. Reached 6950.6 during day.)
    Mar12 2003, FTSE 100=3287, FTSE 100 TR=1624 * (Dot com crash low)
    Jan30 2006, FTSE 100=5780, FTSE 100 TR=3141
    Jun15 2007, FTSE 100=6732, FTSE 100 TR=3851 * (Pre credit crisis high)
    Oct12 2007, FTSE 100=6730, FTSE 100 TR=3889
    Mar3 2009, FTSE 100=3512, FTSE 100 TR=2147 * (Credit crisis low)
    Feb8 2011, FTSE 100=6091, FTSE 100 TR=3987 * (Inter crisis high)
    Sep22 2011, FTSE 100=5041, FTSE 100 TR=3387 * (Sovereign debt crisis low. Fell below 5000 briefly next day)
    Aug17 2012, FTSE 100=5852, FTSE 100 TR=4077
    Dec19 2012, FTSE 100=5972, FTSE 100 TR=4198
    Feb3 2013, FTSE 100=6347, FTSE 100 TR=4466
    Apr10 2013, FTSE 100=6387, FTSE 100 TR=4539
    Feb24 2014, FTSE 100=6866, FTSE 100 TR=5029 * (Highest close since 1999? Beaten in May and Sept?)
    May9 2014, FTSE 100=6815, FTSE 100 TR=5039
    Jun30 2014, FTSE 100=6744, FTSE 100 TR=5014
    Jul31 2014, FTSE 100=6730, FTSE 100 TR=5008
    Aug29 2014, FTSE 100=6820, FTSE 100 TR=5111
    Sep30 2014, FTSE 100=6623, FTSE 100 TR=4969
    Oct31 2014, FTSE 100=6546, FTSE 100 TR=4920



    Notice how quickly the Total Return index recovers from market dips/crashes, and how far in advance of the 1999 figure it is.

    Of course, someone who didn't invest it all on "day 1" and has instead been drip-feeding into the market, willl have been buying in the dips as well as at the peaks, and will have done much better.
    I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.

    Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    pop_gun wrote: »
    Jim Rickards: well, I would ask that investor how would they feel about losing 30% of their money. That's the history of the stock market.



    I'd say, you haven't lost anything until you sell it and lock in that loss. For example in the recent property correction our property had fallen in value by about £1m in 2009 (from peak), but we didn't sell, now it has risen by about £1.25m (from peak) and in the meantime (and also currently) our rental profits increased, due to lower interest rates. So I don't really see any problem with 30% falls, in fact it is an opportunity to invest further at lower prices, for me that's the whole point of corrections, they are a buying opportunity. I won't invest any more in property because of my age (I'm 57), but I am investing in equities for additional retirement income, I wouldn't touch gold, I don't see what it can do for me.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • le_loup
    le_loup Posts: 4,047 Forumite
    Gosh! You really have got a problem with reality.
    If you want to hold gold and ignore all the advice not to, feel free but it really is not the best thing since sliced bread for most people.
  • gadgetmind
    gadgetmind Posts: 11,130 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    And gold hasn't ever lost 30% of its value?
    I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.

    Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.
  • Gadfium
    Gadfium Posts: 763 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    pop_gun wrote: »
    BIB

    Why do people's perception of the stock market need to change?
    Because with their next breath they spout BS like this:
    pop_gun wrote: »
    BIB
    Haven't enough investors lost their entire savings and a large part of their pensions to the stock market already?
    All of them were looking for modest returns, yet ended up lining some else's pocket.

    What about people that bought gold when it was £1,151 per ounce in September 2011? They've "lost" 30% in less than 3 years.

    What you are doing is displaying a confirmation bias (along with an unhealthy dose of conspiracy theory belief). In other words you are only seeing what supports your belief. Anything that contradicts your belief is either distorted such as this
    pop_gun wrote: »
    Your claim the FTSE would return 70% on it's worse trading day is supposing we all had a crystal ball and knew which stocks and shares would outperform the market on said day. If I had a crystal ball wouldn't it be better to get the winning lottery numbers?
    or ignored such as this:
    gadgetmind wrote: »
    Here are the numbers.

    Dec30 1999, FTSE 100=6930, FTSE 100 TR=3141 * (Dot com crash high. Reached 6950.6 during day.)
    Mar12 2003, FTSE 100=3287, FTSE 100 TR=1624 * (Dot com crash low)
    Jan30 2006, FTSE 100=5780, FTSE 100 TR=3141
    Jun15 2007, FTSE 100=6732, FTSE 100 TR=3851 * (Pre credit crisis high)
    Oct12 2007, FTSE 100=6730, FTSE 100 TR=3889
    Mar3 2009, FTSE 100=3512, FTSE 100 TR=2147 * (Credit crisis low)
    Feb8 2011, FTSE 100=6091, FTSE 100 TR=3987 * (Inter crisis high)
    Sep22 2011, FTSE 100=5041, FTSE 100 TR=3387 * (Sovereign debt crisis low. Fell below 5000 briefly next day)
    Aug17 2012, FTSE 100=5852, FTSE 100 TR=4077
    Dec19 2012, FTSE 100=5972, FTSE 100 TR=4198
    Feb3 2013, FTSE 100=6347, FTSE 100 TR=4466
    Apr10 2013, FTSE 100=6387, FTSE 100 TR=4539
    Feb24 2014, FTSE 100=6866, FTSE 100 TR=5029 * (Highest close since 1999? Beaten in May and Sept?)
    May9 2014, FTSE 100=6815, FTSE 100 TR=5039
    Jun30 2014, FTSE 100=6744, FTSE 100 TR=5014
    Jul31 2014, FTSE 100=6730, FTSE 100 TR=5008
    Aug29 2014, FTSE 100=6820, FTSE 100 TR=5111
    Sep30 2014, FTSE 100=6623, FTSE 100 TR=4969
    Oct31 2014, FTSE 100=6546, FTSE 100 TR=4920



    Notice how quickly the Total Return index recovers from market dips/crashes, and how far in advance of the 1999 figure it is.

    Of course, someone who didn't invest it all on "day 1" and has instead been drip-feeding into the market, willl have been buying in the dips as well as at the peaks, and will have done much better.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.