Opinions please

marjrie_2

I know that no one can make my decision for me, our house is under offer and we have seen 2 houses that we like, and can't decide!!!
One is an almost new build, and perhaps not so homely, but I guess we can make it home.
The other is older and more established, but perhaps not such a nice looking house from the outside.
We are retired, so are looking to not have much work to do, but don't mind gardening and decorating.
We want space for family to visit, ideally would like a large bungalow, but they are all way over our budget.
Anyway here they are
http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-33219030.html

And

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-50025425.html?premiumA=true

What do you all think?

stu12345_2

im no expert, but if i was retired id go for the one that had least repairs, but more importantly, the one that was closest to numerous amenities within walking distance.

i say this as living in cornwall, numerous retirees bought detached homes in villages with no hospital, entertainment, bus links etc. and regret it.

i have a relative who is a builder, but older than me, and he bought a new build, he said it will fall down after he dies, but will cause him less probs during his lifespan, he could have bought a stone built old home that will out live him by years, but cause him numerous repairs during his retirement
and he bought in in the suburbs of a reasonable sized town with every amenities a middle aged or a pensioner requires, without the need for a car.
plus friends can visit easily by train or bus

~Beanie~

I prefer the older one, it has a more homely feel, the newer one looks a bit clinical.

CathA

Second one definitely. It's been built long enough that any problems you would get with snagging issues (in the newer house) won't be an issue.

stu12345_2

id buy a newish small house within walking distance of a town centre, perhaps one that is around 5 yrs old and has snagging issues dealt with and has some part of the 10 yr warranty left.

but as both houses are modern, youve avoided period homes, so its down to cost and more importantly location.

EverGreen_2

Both are nice.
But i would definitely go for the second (older) one. ...more homely feelings in it.

GwylimT

Is that a carpet in the bathroom? If so before buying make sure the floorboards don't need replacing.

They aren't too different, if it comes to a time where your mobility isn't great are both homes suitable for both a stair lift and an accessible bathroom. How far are things like a local shop and bus stop.

engineer_amy

The second older one is much nicer from the photos shown. It has a lived in feel. And look at the difference between the back gardens. The new one is just a lawn. The old one has all the features, Imagine sitting in that garden in the summer, without having to do anything but mow the lawn. You would have to start from scratch in the new build garden

plumfin

I would check on the potential development on the first option to see how much green land will remain after all the houses are built. If it will stay as it is, I would go for that one with a more rural feel. Totally down to your heart though I think! Go and see them. Good luck.

Hillbilly1

Do you actually need 4 beds? That's a lot of space and cost for a few visits?

My in laws extended their retirement home to accommodate having all 3 children at home at once. This never happened for various reasons.

Now one son lives abroad and has 3 kids, so not enough room for them all at once with all their stuff. We never stay over and other child loves close by so never stays over., and also has kids so not enough space for them either. Therefore they are paying out bills for a big house that is never used.

Theres a 3 bed in nursery close for 225k. It's got a separate dining room down stairs you could use as an occasional bed room when needed. It's detached, with garage and parking. Sorry I can't post a link to it from the prime location app!

Waterlily24

The second one for me too.