We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
PCN From Smart Parking - But I Don't Drive?
Comments
-
I love watching off-topic internet arguments. I can never tell who is the bigger fool, I don't particularly care who is right, if either are, but it does entertain me
Carry on.<--- Nothing to see here - move along --->0 -
It is an offence to open mail which was intended for someone else. If someone else's mail arrives at your address (with your address incorrectly on it), as someone has already pointed out then you should simply write "not known at this address" and re-post it.
There is the small matter of confidentiality and privacy to consider.
http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/nireland/consumer_ni/consumer_post_e/consumer_problems_with_post_e/consumer_problems_with_post_delivery_e/your_post_is_being_opened_or_tampered_with_by_someone_else.htm
That link is for if mail addressed to you is tampered with and the postal services act which it mentions is about privatisation and open competition in the mail market. The mail had the OP’s address on it, therefore they can open it if they wish. Name is not the same as address.The truth may be out there, but the lies are inside your head. Terry Pratchett
http.thisisnotalink.cöm0 -
... what I could of said was "IT CAN" be an offence so I will concede ...
At last, we are getting somewhere. He admits that he was wrong.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0 -
could have ... should have 0
-
adouglasmhor wrote: »That link is for if mail addressed to you is tampered with and the postal services act which it mentions is about privatisation and open competition in the mail market. The mail had the OP’s address on it, therefore they can open it if they wish. Name is not the same as address.
http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/nireland/consumer_ni/consumer_post_e/consumer_problems_with_post_e/consumer_problems_with_post_delivery_e/youre_receiving_someone_elses_mail.htmPLEASE NOTEMy advice should be used as guidance only. You should always obtain face to face professional advice before taking any action.0 -
... what I could of said was "IT CAN" be an offence so I will concede ...
At last, we are getting somewhere. He admits that he was wrong.
According to you it was "rubbish" that it was an offence in any event. But then you went back and changed it to the lesser 'offence' of 'misinformation' without anyone noticing...or so you thought (post #12)
PLEASE NOTEMy advice should be used as guidance only. You should always obtain face to face professional advice before taking any action.0 -
That's general advice not legal advice. So not exactly relevant to your outlandish claims.The truth may be out there, but the lies are inside your head. Terry Pratchett
http.thisisnotalink.cöm0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards