Salmond and Sturgeon Want the English Fish for More Fat Subsidies

Leanne1812

Gangaweed wrote: »

It's just laughable reading the SNP stooges posts. They are totally devoid of logic.

That what they call "Project Fear" is what we call facts says it all. Heck, we even have someone arguing that a fall in the price of the main economic export of 50% isn't a problem.

I don't understand why the SNP and the Greens don't form a coalition. Match made in heaven.

Oh, so I am a stooge? Nice :-)

I suppose I could retort something back but I wont. It's rather childish and immature to call others who don't think like you names.


Actually it was the No campaign who coined the 'Project Fear' phrase. I suppose it shows how much attention you pay.

No one said the fall in oil price isn't bad. Of course it is bad! But, as has been discussed endlessly we wouldn't actually be independent until spring 2016 so you can speculate all you like but none of us know what the price will be then. It's also quite widely known it is a volatile recourse. There, cleared that up for you.

It's plain to see you don't support independence but you know 1.6 million did. Are you seriously saying that number of folk are devoid of any logic? :rotfl:

Leanne1812

zagubov wrote: »

OK I thought this threasd had bottomed out ages ago, but now it's surprised me by reaching a new low.:D

Exactly my thoughts too. Some people eh?.........

Puts me in mind of a friend of mine who even if told he would be 1 million quid richer a year would still have voted no. You can't change that mindset. Funnily enough, we are still friends. :-) There's no bitterness between us. It troubles me though that it is shining out of some people.

.string.

zagubov wrote:

.string. wrote:

What have you got to offer for splitting so many families into mutually vindictive foreigners?

OK I thought this thread had bottomed out ages ago, but now it's surprised me by reaching a new low.:D

It's what you get from the SNP policy of blaming all sorts of imaginary troubles on Westminster, aka the UK, and deliberately provoking hostility in this otherwise neighbour-friendly Island. It's their policy, not mine, not the UK, but part of the grand strategy of divide and rule by the nats. A deliberately contrived consequence.

Leanne1812

.string. wrote: »

It's what you get from the SNP policy of blaming all sorts of imaginary troubles on Westminster, aka the UK, and deliberately provoking hostility in this otherwise neighbour-friendly Island. It's their policy, not mine, not the UK, but part of the grand strategy of divide and rule by the nats. A deliberately contrived consequence.

So westminster are doing a grand job of governing? I can only speak for myself but I felt a small government based Scotland looking out for 5 million citizens might actually be good. Oh, not having to subsidise the ever increasing HOL was a plus too. That's just daft though isn't it?

I think you're imagining the snp created hostility. There's always been an element but why bother with the truth eh.

Tromking

Shakethedisease wrote: »

I guess May will be a good indicator one way or the other as to where the Union, Scotland and the SNP are going.

I don't think so.
A nice safe vote for Scottish Nationalism in an election to the UK parliament means diddly squat as regards the future of Scotland in the Union. I know you're desperate to believe that 40 odd SNP MP's is akin to the Scottish people serving notice on leaving the Union, but it isn't.

elantan

zagubov wrote: »

OK I thought this thread had bottomed out ages ago, but now it's surprised me by reaching a new low.:D

I'm telling ya its cyclical ... It'll no be long till ye older I hate aalex Salmond comes out the woodwork lol

HAMISH_MCTAVISH

Tromking wrote: »

I don't think so.
A nice safe vote for Scottish Nationalism in an election to the UK parliament means diddly squat as regards the future of Scotland in the Union. I know you're desperate to believe that 40 odd SNP MP's is akin to the Scottish people serving notice on leaving the Union, but it isn't.

Agreed.

20% of previous SNP voters voted No in the referendum.

A significant proportion of SNP support today will be voting SNP safe in the knowledge that this matter is settled for a generation and a vote for a decent local SNP candidate to represent a constituency is NOT a vote for a Neverendum.

elantan

HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »

Agreed.

20% of previous SNP voters voted No in the referendum.

A significant proportion of SNP support today will be voting SNP safe in the knowledge that this matter is settled for a generation and a vote for a decent local SNP candidate to represent a constituency is NOT a vote for a Neverendum.

Àhh the blissfulness of ignorance ... How I miss those simple days

elantan

Today alone in Scotland there was the first of two WFI AGM's I say first as they didn't have the space for one, so the second one will be in two weeks time in Perth, RIC were out campaigning , Lesley Riddoch sold out her wee white blossom date and a fair few converged on the steps ( no where near as many as was expected)

The SNP were out in force doing their stalls and door chapping and the CW had a meeting or two ....

I however spent the day in my polytunnel listening to the various meetings ... Live nation do a phenomenal job

ruggedtoast

Ah, I checked alexa again. Its still so wee.

Wee wee wee wee wee. And it always will be.