We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

This could be in the wrong sub-cat

Hello all.

Could I just ask for your feelings and views towards this please.?

Person executing a will sells house as a part of an estate of a deceased relative.

Without going into the minute details, what are the views if....

New owners (via estate agent) are asked for meter readings, which are duly provided. Problem is, it's known for a 100% certainty by the seller to be incorrect / false.

The buyer knows the situation regarding the seller being executor of a late relative's will, that the seller lives an hour and a half drive away, has the rest of the issues around the estate to deal with, as well as whatever else going on in their own lives.

Would you think it was an error, or would you feel the buyers are trying it on and attempting to get over £900 of free utilities.?

Any views welcome, or questions too.
«1

Comments

  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    makeitstop wrote: »
    Hello all.

    Could I just ask for your feelings and views towards this please.?

    Person executing a will sells house as a part of an estate of a deceased relative.

    Without going into the minute details, what are the views if....

    New owners (via estate agent) are asked for meter readings, which are duly provided. Problem is, it's known for a 100% certainty by the seller to be incorrect / false.

    The buyer knows the situation regarding the seller being executor of a late relative's will, that the seller lives an hour and a half drive away, has the rest of the issues around the estate to deal with, as well as whatever else going on in their own lives.

    Would you think it was an error, or would you feel the buyers are trying it on and attempting to get over £900 of free utilities.?

    Any views welcome, or questions too.

    How are they getting utilities for free? Utility contracts are with the person not the property.

    They could just as easily say 'Sod off'
  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 18,263 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I guess you just ask them to re-check the readings as they don't seem to tally with your records.

    If you like, you could ask them to email photos of meter dials as well.
  • nobblyned
    nobblyned Posts: 705 Forumite
    makeitstop wrote: »
    Hello all.

    Could I just ask for your feelings and views towards this please.?

    Person executing a will sells house as a part of an estate of a deceased relative.

    Without going into the minute details, what are the views if....

    New owners (via estate agent) are asked for meter readings, which are duly provided. Problem is, it's known for a 100% certainty by the seller to be incorrect / false.

    The buyer knows the situation regarding the seller being executor of a late relative's will, that the seller lives an hour and a half drive away, has the rest of the issues around the estate to deal with, as well as whatever else going on in their own lives.

    Would you think it was an error, or would you feel the buyers are trying it on and attempting to get over £900 of free utilities.?

    Any views welcome, or questions too.

    What do meter readings have to do with the estate agent? Vendor provides meter readings to the utility company at the point of sale. If you are too far away to take readings, you should have got your agent to take photographic evidence at point of completion. What exactly is the issue? Who is ripping off whom?
  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 18,263 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    nobblyned wrote: »
    ...
    What exactly is the issue? Who is ripping off whom?

    I imagine the accusation is that the buyer is providing incorrect 'opening readings' to the utility companies, so that the seller has to pay £900 too much in charges, and the buyer has to pay £900 too little.

    (If the buyer is doing it intentionally, it would be fraud.)
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    As above, seller can query the figures with the buyers (I'd be inclined to think it probably is a misreading). Presumably the executors can get hold of actual previous readings and can work out from that what the likely readings ought to be.
  • Lord_Baltimore
    Lord_Baltimore Posts: 1,348 Forumite
    edited 8 January 2015 at 12:42AM
    I'd contact the new owners direct and tell them you've accidentally lost their readings but add that you have found readings you know to be correct. Give them your figures and ask them to confirm the readings.

    They may back down but if they stick with their readings, you may be stuffed.
    Mornië utulië
  • fishpond
    fishpond Posts: 1,022 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 8 January 2015 at 6:11AM
    "the executor lives an hour and a half drive away"
    So!
    The executor can claim reasonable expenses from the estate!

    The executor travels to the property, takes the readings and photographs meter readings, informs utility companies of readings, explaining they will be paid when estate is at least part settled and money is available.

    Do not rely on someone else.

    The executor of the will has a duty to the beneficiaries of the estate to look after the deceased estate including money.
    Being an executor of a will carries far more responsibility than a lot of people are aware of, it basically means the executor has to put their own lives on hold. If they cannot act in the correct manner they should have passed the job to someone else/solicitor.
    Simples
    I am a LandLord,(under review) so there!:p
  • DRP
    DRP Posts: 4,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    makeitstop wrote: »
    Hello all.

    Could I just ask for your feelings and views towards this please.?

    Person executing a will sells house as a part of an estate of a deceased relative.

    Without going into the minute details, what are the views if....

    New owners (via estate agent) are asked for meter readings, which are duly provided. Problem is, it's known for a 100% certainty by the seller to be incorrect / false.

    "100% certain" ?

    why hasn't the seller supplied readings to the utilities co?

    And an hour and a half away isn't exactly the end of the world in order to sort something like this out..
  • eddddy wrote: »
    I imagine the accusation is that the buyer is providing incorrect 'opening readings' to the utility companies, so that the seller has to pay £900 too much in charges, and the buyer has to pay £900 too little.

    (If the buyer is doing it intentionally, it would be fraud.)


    Apologies to all who have responded to this thread, it was late, I have flu, and was in bed by the time any replies came back on this.

    Anyhow, yes, in short, the above nails it.

    I "know" exactly what the gas reading actually is now, as the agent working on my behalf for the sale went back to the property (which is empty and in need of major refubishment) to read it himself. It was exactly as it was back in July last year, and was certainly nowhere near the figure estimated by the supplier up to December, and less than half what the new owner stated it was to my estate agent when asked.

    The electricity reading is less dramatic, but, in an empty property, with absolutely no electrical equipment to consume power, I am a little surprised at how there can be a reading of more than 600 units consumed from July to December 2014, which were the dates from when the meters were last actually read / provided, to an estimated reading at the end of the year.

    My relative was dead in early May and the property was empty and totally cleared of any consuming device by the date the last "actual" reading was provided (July).

    I fully understand this is something I should have remembered to get done late in the year, knowing the completion of sale was imminent, but it slipped my mind foolishly. That may be an oversight on my part, but surely it's not too much to ask for people to be truthful and accurate in providing a simple set of readings in an empty house. I'd bet it would be right if it was their money they stood to loose by sending incorrect readings.
  • fishpond wrote: »
    "the executor lives an hour and a half drive away"
    So!
    The executor can claim reasonable expenses from the estate!

    The executor travels to the property, takes the readings and photographs meter readings, informs utility companies of readings, explaining they will be paid when estate is at least part settled and money is available.

    Do not rely on someone else.

    The executor of the will has a duty to the beneficiaries of the estate to look after the deceased estate including money.
    Being an executor of a will carries far more responsibility than a lot of people are aware of, it basically means the executor has to put their own lives on hold. If they cannot act in the correct manner they should have passed the job to someone else/solicitor.
    Simples


    Yes all correct and of course it is possible to drive to the property in order to take readings, but, that's not entirely practical when I can ask the agent to do that who is only a mile and a half up the road.

    Also, yes I agree, being an executor does come with responsibilities, but, it doesn't mean having to put your life on hold. It can, and has been managed just fine. The oversight with getting final readings is my fault yes, but these will be final readings in a house which will have consumed nothing in reality over a six month period since the last "actual" readings "were" provided. I had personally turned the water and gas supply off, and the people who were employed to clear and clean the property turned off the electricity supply at the mains when they left.

    Finally, I agree that anyone who cannot act in the correct manner should give the job to someone else, but that's not exactly the issue here is it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.