We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Best approach to neighbour problem
Comments
-
Just as an aside, why do you need to reverse out with the hedges? Generally much safer to reverse in and drive out forwards so you can see...
Another vote for block him in here.
The very passive aggressive would let the tyres down. You don't actually want to do damage, that's very illegal but flat tyres are less risky. If nothing else he'll need a pump.What if there was no such thing as a rhetorical question?0 -
Because it's effectively in and out, although not signed to specify one as in and one as out. There's room for two cars abreast so if he parked considerately I'd be able to drive past him and exit using the other access.0
-
Just as an aside, why do you need to reverse out with the hedges? Generally much safer to reverse in and drive out forwards so you can see...
Another vote for block him in here.
The very passive aggressive would let the tyres down. You don't actually want to do damage, that's very illegal but flat tyres are less risky. If nothing else he'll need a pump.
Letting tyres down is seen by the BIB as criminal damage and is likely to get you a battering from the intellectually challenged Neanderthal owner of the vehicle.
Nails or broken glass casually thrown under the tyres as you walk by in the dark is less likely to get you caught.0 -
Letting tyres down is seen by the BIB as criminal damage and is likely to get you a battering from the intellectually challenged Neanderthal owner of the vehicle.
Nails or broken glass casually thrown under the tyres as you walk by in the dark is less likely to get you caught.
Actually it isn't.
At best both would be "Causing Danger to other road users" Section 22A RTA
A person is guilty of an offence if he intentionally and without lawful authority or reasonable cause—
(a)causes anything to be on or over a road, or
(b)interferes with a motor vehicle, trailer or cycle, or
(c)interferes (directly or indirectly) with traffic equipment,
in such circumstances that it would be obvious to a reasonable person that to do so would be dangerousWhat if there was no such thing as a rhetorical question?0 -
If he is upsetting all the other residents as well then complain to the management company as a united front and in the mean time take it in turns to block them in.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.5K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards