We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Delicate situation - exchanging contracts

marco501
Posts: 68 Forumite
Hi,
I am in need of some assistance from someone with conveyancing expertise as I am having difficulties obtaining a satisfactory explanation from my own conveyancer.
Basically, I am in the process of selling a property and buying another property. The buyer does not know about my purchase and I was intending to exchange contracts with them first and then exchange contracts with the seller immediately afterwards.
My conveyancer says I need to tell the buyer `because I will need to synchronise the sale with the purchase as contracts will have to be released to us`.
What does `releasing contracts` mean please? Many thanks in advance for any words of wisdom.
I am in need of some assistance from someone with conveyancing expertise as I am having difficulties obtaining a satisfactory explanation from my own conveyancer.
Basically, I am in the process of selling a property and buying another property. The buyer does not know about my purchase and I was intending to exchange contracts with them first and then exchange contracts with the seller immediately afterwards.
My conveyancer says I need to tell the buyer `because I will need to synchronise the sale with the purchase as contracts will have to be released to us`.
What does `releasing contracts` mean please? Many thanks in advance for any words of wisdom.
0
Comments
-
Potentially you could end up homeless unless you can complete purchase without the sale.
Usually your purchase is conditional on you sale so contracts and money transfers reflect the dependency0 -
martin.cat wrote: »Potentially you could end up homeless unless you can complete purchase without the sale.
Usually your purchase is conditional on you sale so contracts and money transfers reflect the dependency
OP is proposing to complete their sale first, not the other way around. They are entitled to do this as long as they are aware that their purchase could fall through. They don't HAVE to be tied together although you normally have to exchange on your sale before your purchase unless you already have the cash to complete your purchase.
As long as OP has a backup plan (eg renting) they should be able to exchange on their sale before their purchase.0 -
There are 2 options:
1) keep the 2 transactions seperate.
a) A risk is that your conveyancer may Exchange contracts on your sale, thus committing you to sell. Your purchase may then be delayed or cancelled, leaving you homeless. Are you prepared to take this risk?
b) you/your solicitor will in any case need to delay Exchange on your sale until you have at least a reasonable chance of Exchanging quickly on your purchase. How will you explain this delay to your buyer?
c) I can see no benefit in this option, though you may have some reason for iy
2) You link the 2 transactions
a) this is the normal process
b) Conveyancers have an established process for Exchanging on sales/purchase simultaneously, thus ensuring their client is not left either homeless, or in possession of 2 properties
c) Conveyencers also have an established process for using the funds from a sale for a simultaneous purchase
d) but the processes described above require all parties to be aware of the 'chain' (ie the linked transactions.
I do not know what 'releasing' the contracts means.0 -
TheCyclingProgrammer wrote: »OP is proposing to complete their sale first,Trying to be a man is a waste of a woman0
-
I think I understand it.
So conveyancer exchanges with buyer and if the purchase doesn't go through then he can retract?
Is a time limit set? How long is this usually?0 -
I think I understand it.
So conveyancer exchanges with buyer and if the purchase doesn't go through then he can retract?
Is a time limit set? How long is this usually?
No, retraction after exchange costs a fortune. Exchange makes you legally bound to sell and buy.Trying to be a man is a waste of a woman0 -
notanewuser wrote: »Are they? That isn't what they've said.
Fair point, they said nothing about completion deadlines but they are proposing to exchange with their buyer first, which does commit you to selling before buying, which was my point.0 -
He talks about getting a `reverse release` which is to exchange with the seller and then exchange with the buyer if the seller's solicitors are happy to do this.
Does any of this make sense?0 -
OP would be better off explaining what they are trying to achieve and why. Why do they want to keep their buyer in the dark about their purchase?0
-
I think I understand it.
So conveyancer exchanges with buyer and if the purchase doesn't go through then he can retract?
Is a time limit set? How long is this usually?
that is my normally people Exchange on sale and purchase simultaneously>0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards