NOW OPEN: the MSE Forum 'Ask An Expert' event. This time we'd like your questions on TRAVEL & HOLIDAY DEALS. Post by Wed and deals expert MSE Oli will answer as many as he can.

Pensioner Bonds Guide

Hi!

This is the discussion thread for the



Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.


Thanks, folks

Thanks folks,
«13456743

Replies

  • Or, you could get 3-5% on your savings in a bank account (though you'll need to work).

    I don't work, I have all those accounts, I do read T&Cs, I have never come across any current account that required me to work.
  • MSE_Helen_SMSE_Helen_S MSE Staff
    106 Posts
    Tenth Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker I've been Money Tipped!
    MSE Staff
    Thanks, Archi Bald.

    We're just doing our final checks on the guide, and we've amended that to say "...work for it"
  • NuukNuuk Forumite
    43 Posts
    I would advise extreme caution when investing with NS&I. Their website qualifies as one of the most unreliable on the Internet, and some of their staff clearly don't understand plain English.
  • edited 10 December 2014 at 12:59PM
    20102010 Forumite
    5.1K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite
    edited 10 December 2014 at 12:59PM
    A good article that covers all you need to know but of course the crunch will come this Friday when the rates are announced.
    2.6% and 4% seems a bit too optomistic.
    But even 2% and 2.75% is better than anything currently on offer excepting current accounts.

    If the rates are lower than originally stated then I might just go for a two year fix with Shawbrook paying 2.25% gross.
  • edited 10 December 2014 at 1:48PM
    edited 10 December 2014 at 1:48PM
    The very first thing that struck me is that some pensioners are excluded from this.

    I'm a pensioner, but will be excluded for instance.

    Now I could just about understand this if it were one of those things whereby "Ah....but you aren't going to be deemed to be a pensioner until you reach your revised State Pension Age" (courtesy of me being a woman who retired at 60 as per plan).


    BUT....I will reach that revised State Pension Age of mine next year and will then receive the State part of my pension and be a pensioner according to any definition going of pensioner and I'll have my full pensioner income. That being the case - how come I'll apparently be expected to wait about 2 more years (ie until I reach 65) before I can have these?

    Dear Government - Thanks a bunch for expecting me to spend about 2 years of being a "fully-fledged" pensioner but not getting everything due to a pensioner.
  • SystemSystem Community Admin
    178K Posts
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Community Admin

    but not getting everything due to a pensioner.


    That's because they aren't pensioner bonds. They are investor bonds for the over 65s.

    Read the label before criticising the contents of the tin.
  • That's because they aren't pensioner bonds. They are investor bonds for the over 65s.

    Read the label before criticising the contents of the tin.

    I think she has a valid point. Furthermore there are other very unfair aspects with this. First of all the cap is way too high. The richest pensioners will gobble up all of their 20K allocations and anyone slow off the mark (probably the poorer and less informed) will not get any. Plus there should be an annual allocation. How in a fair society can it be right that some people, by virtue of their date of birth, are eligible for favourable treatment? You don't want to become a pensioner in the next two years. You won't get this and you won't get the new £155 per week flat rate even if you have paid years more contributions than others who will get it. And, yes I am bitter!
  • SystemSystem Community Admin
    178K Posts
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Community Admin
    dc1350 wrote: »

    How in a fair society can it be right that some people, by virtue of their date of birth, are eligible for favourable treatment?


    Because society has decided that in general, age should be one determinant of who gets what.
    Thus older people get a winter fuel allowance, younger people get student loans or apprentice places. Older people, and the very young get offered flu jabs. Only people over 55 are allowed to draw their pensions.
    Only people over 18 (or perhaps soon 16) get the vote. You have to be 17 before you are allowed to join the army and get killed. If you are over 70 you have to renew your driving licence.

    Life is full of "unfair" distinctions based on age. Would you sweep them all away?
  • mgdavidmgdavid Forumite
    6.7K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    For MSE Helen -
    seems there could be a need for a 'Who is eligible' paragraph up front; many will be misled by 'Pensioner' Bonds and miss the 65+ bit.
    The questions that get the best answers are the questions that give most detail....
  • Ken68Ken68 Forumite
    6.8K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Energy Saving Champion Home Insurance Hacker!
    Forumite
    Thank you Helen. here's hoping 4%.
This discussion has been closed.
Latest MSE News and Guides

Energy Price Cap change

Martin Lewis on what it means for you

MSE News

Best £1 you've ever spent?

Share your most impressive bargains

MSE Forum