We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Non-disclosure on insurance - how to rectify?
Options
Comments
-
Aviva and Direct Line
A comparison site will ask the question based on the longest claims history that any of its insurers require (so 5 years). However if you get quotes through individual insurer's websites you'll find that many of them onlyask for shorter histories.0 -
Please ignore this advice as it could cost you a serious amount of money.
If you're asked a question to the effect "have you had any Accidents, Claims or LOSSES" within the last five years you must answer it truthfully
That was my personal view.
In any event, I doubt an insurer would refuse indemnity based on non disclosure of an incident where there was no claim and no payout. At the very worst, they would ask for the difference in premium between declaring the previous incident and not doing so. That would be if they decided to take the point.0 -
What do you define as a "loss" though?0
-
straighttalker wrote: »That was my personal view.
In any event, I doubt an insurer would refuse indemnity based on non disclosure of an incident where there was no claim and no payout. At the very worst, they would ask for the difference in premium between declaring the previous incident and not doing so. That would be if they decided to take the point.
At the very worst they would void the policy from inception leaving the OP to pay for any claim against him and also any of his own damage. In addition he would have a void policy to declare which will have a huge impact on his future premiums for any type of Insurance.
Your example of a "very worst" scenario is actually a VERY BEST scenario.
Other potential scenarios are he takes a policy out with an Insurer who automatically checks the claims/ losses he's declared against his the database. There are plenty of Insurers who do this and the one's who do will normally cancel his policy. This leaves him with a cancelled policy to declare again affecting any type of Insurance he takes out in future including motor, household and life insurance.
As I stated, your advice not to declare could cost him a serious amount of money if he follows it and is caught out. Your advice is especially cavalier as you do not know the rest of the OP's details. He could have a couple of offences on his licence or a serious offence which make the chance of an Insurer overlooking the non disclosed fire even less likely.
The loss will no longer need to be declared after May 2015 so he only needs to declare it for the next six months.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards