We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Is this illegal????

13»

Comments

  • steve0115
    steve0115 Posts: 10 Forumite
    amcluesent wrote: »
    >any law that says I cant buy the house for say £50000 or even less if there is no law?<

    Would you be OK if the house was sold to you at 'market value'?

    If so consider this approach. Your Mum now sells you a 1m wide strip of land at the border of the house and the street. You now have control over access rights to the property.

    If and when the house comes on the market, it is professionally valued on the basis that a 3rd party owns the 'ransom strip' and title to that isn't being sold. This will severely reduce the market value of the property, which you buy, but it is still being sold at the market price so shouldn't be defined as a Deprivation of Assets



    Can somebody in the know please comment on this idea. Would it be viable or just seen by the taxman as a totally illegal dodge cause if so GOOD IDEA!! I cant see anything wrong with trying to get the best deal possible. After all you are only trying to get what should be rightfully yours. Good luck to anyone legally getting round the system. Thats what "loopholes" are for!!

    PS. I'm no religious person but. GOD BLESS Katy kat and her nan:grouphug: :grouphug:
  • iolanthe07
    iolanthe07 Posts: 5,493 Forumite
    If so consider this approach. Your Mum now sells you a 1m wide strip of land at the border of the house and the street. You now have control over access rights to the property.

    If and when the house comes on the market, it is professionally valued on the basis that a 3rd party owns the 'ransom strip' and title to that isn't being sold. This will severely reduce the market value of the property, which you buy, but it is
    still being sold at the market price so shouldn't be defined as a Deprivation of Assets

    If it was that easy everyone would do it.
    I used to think that good grammar is important, but now I know that good wine is importanter.
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    My father had Alzheimers and was put into a care home at no cost to my mother. This was because he was becoming violent so it was considered a medical rather than a social need.

    My mother got loads of help from the Alzheimers Society.
  • mightymouse
    mightymouse Posts: 319 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    cats! wrote: »
    Is your mum going into a home because of health or social needs? There have been test cases (the coughlin case or something similar??).

    Try this re above quote http://www.gpss.tripoduk.com/nhscare/
  • Biggles
    Biggles Posts: 8,209 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    amcluesent wrote: »
    Would you be OK if the house was sold to you at 'market value'?

    If so consider this approach. Your Mum now sells you a 1m wide strip of land at the border of the house and the street. You now have control over access rights to the property.

    If and when the house comes on the market, it is professionally valued on the basis that a 3rd party owns the 'ransom strip' and title to that isn't being sold. This will severely reduce the market value of the property, which you buy, but it is still being sold at the market price so shouldn't be defined as a Deprivation of Assets
    It would be deprivation of assets, as you had artificially reduced the value of the house.

    It may get spotted, it may not, but I wouldn't want to be caught fiddling it.
  • Katykat
    Katykat Posts: 1,743 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Why thankyou for your blessing Steve, gave me chuckle - its actually my Mum, My Nan would be about 130 yrs old by now- but I bet they'd still try to squeeze blood out of her.
    :smileyhea A SMILE COSTS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING
  • Biggles
    Biggles Posts: 8,209 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Couple of other points, Katy.

    To say, "She will only be allowed to keep £16000", isn't how it works. I think the figure is £21,000 at the moment, and above that she pays in full for the home. So her house proceeds may last 5 years or so. When her assets drop below £21,000, she'll get a little help, which increases as her funds reduce; I think below £8,000, she gets full assistance. But for the sale price of your Mum's house, you would probably be able to buy an immediate care needs plan that would cover the costs of a care home of her choice (not the Council's) for the rest of her life and to still have some money left in the bank. The cost of these plans depend on her age, health etc. Start here https://www.hsbcpensions.co.uk/nhfa/pages/index.asp and look on the Silver Savers board for more info.

    Secondly, however, I don't know what other family she has, but to be found to have bought a home worth £100,000 off an old lady with Alzheimers for £50,000 could look pretty bad. And if the only reason you could give was 'to defraud the local council', it might not look any better. I know you want to do it for the right reasons, but think how it would look, either to the family or to anyone in authority. ;-)
  • You can put the money / house into a trust. See a solicitor.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.