PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Buying previous searches and survey from fallen through purchase

Hi All,

We have finally found a house and had our offer accepted just over a week ago. :j
Everything seems to be going quite well and quick as we had our mortgage approved already, solicitors have had a pack of documents from the vendor.
Everyone would love to complete before Christmas even though it sounds very optimistic. :eek:

We have had a letter from our solicitors who received a letter from vendor's solicitor that the previous buyer (purchase fell through as the chain fell apart and we are first time buyers) would potentially want to sell the searches and the homebuyers report that they had done at the time.

Is this a normal practice? Is there any point in doing so?
It appears that the prices they are asking for would not offer us much of a saving although obviously it would speed things up (at least the searches I guess as I can have the homebuyers report at the end of next week).

Thanks!

Comments

  • Yes, it is normal practice to certainly sell on searches if a previous buyer has dropped out. As for price, that is negotiable but I guess it will also save time.
    I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the Debt free Wannabe, Budgeting and Banking and Savings and Investment boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.

    The 365 Day 1p Challenge 2025 #1 £667.95/£72.60
    Save £12k in 2025 #1 £12000/£4000
  • Yorkie1
    Yorkie1 Posts: 11,909 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    1. Will your lender be happy with old searches (I believe some expire after a certain period of time)?

    2. Are you happy with old searches, particularly any that your lender might not be too bothered about?

    3. Are you confident that if anything goes wrong with the house, you'll have legal comeback against the surveyor? Usually the duty of care is owed only to the original buyer. Also, often the survey is written solely for their eyes and specifically says it shouldn't be passed on.
  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 17,766 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Be careful about buying the Homebuyer's Report.

    You would have no contract with the Surveyor that did the report, and they probably have no duty of care to you as you are not their customer.

    So if it turns out that they were negligent (e.g. they failed to spot problems etc), you cannot claim against them.
  • stator
    stator Posts: 7,441 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I doubt the mortgage company will accept someone else's searches.
    As above you could buy the home buyer's report if you wanted to see it, but the surveyor would probably refuse to talk to you and you would have no redress against him. So if you are sure the house has no problems and just want to take a peek, go ahead. But if you want something solid you'll have to get your own done.
    Changing the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.
  • rosie383
    rosie383 Posts: 4,981 Forumite
    Surely the searches would be ok to be passed on as they are for information only. Or am I wrong? It's something I had wondered about. Valid point about the survey though.
    Father Ted: Now concentrate this time, Dougal. These
    (he points to some plastic cows on the table) are very small; those (pointing at some cows out of the window) are far away...
    :D:D:D
  • Yorkie1
    Yorkie1 Posts: 11,909 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    rosie383 wrote: »
    Surely the searches would be ok to be passed on as they are for information only. Or am I wrong? It's something I had wondered about. Valid point about the survey though.

    Some searches will not change over time; others could well change the day after the previous search is done. Reliance on dated searches is therefore a mixed blessing.
  • stator
    stator Posts: 7,441 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    rosie383 wrote: »
    Surely the searches would be ok to be passed on as they are for information only. Or am I wrong? It's something I had wondered about. Valid point about the survey though.
    If your solicitor/conveyencer fails to do the correct searches and something comes up, the mortgage company can sue the solicitor/conveyencer for negligence. If your conveyencer is acting for the mortgage company I don't think it's likely he will sign off on the purchase if he can't be 100% the searches are complete and comprehensive. If he's getting them from an unknown third party they wouldn't have the same authenticity as original searches from his normal supplier.
    Changing the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.
  • phill99
    phill99 Posts: 9,093 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    You wont be able to use the survey. The relationship is between the surveyor and the client. The contract will specifically exclude use by third parties (you).
    Eat vegetables and fear no creditors, rather than eat duck and hide.
  • qbazdz
    qbazdz Posts: 140 Forumite
    Thank you all for your comments!
    It confirms my concerns and what the conveyancer said, although I initially took it with a pinch of salt.
    For the sake of a few hundred pounds on a 350k sale I guess its better to be covered with all duties of care etc so we will just have to wait a bit longer thats all.

    Thanks again!
  • We had our first buyers pull out just before anticipated exchange. We quickly got a new buyer and he used the old buyers searches, and other documents like fixtures & fittings got reused, but the new buyer got his own survey. This all worked out fine.
    Good luck!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.