Clixsense, Neobux, Crowdflower 2014/5 thread.

snowcauldron

#774750 - 'Understanding Web Searches (2015)' : 10 @ 8 cents on Neo. Level 2 task.

Perfectly straightforward, no test questions, easy 104 cents for the goldies.

ollyh1990

771697
What Does This Twitter Profile Describe? (Potential Explicit Content)
level_3_contributors

$0.07 on CS, presumably more on other platforms. Really easy job, takes 20-30 seconds per task, a limit of 288 and no ambiguous test questions (so far!)

Edit: Got to 38 and now have an error and can't do any more frustratingly, perhaps I did them too fast, though it's hard not to do such a simple task quickly.

snowcauldron

ollyh1990 wrote: »

771697

Edit: Got to 38 and now have an error and can't do any more frustratingly, perhaps I did them too fast, though it's hard not to do such a simple task quickly.

Yeah, I cannot access this task at all. Just getting an error screen. Always been the case with this one.

KONG

How many PTC sites are you people on?

Super_Trouper

Does anyone know how to complete the Fisher Investments mobile tasks? I've seen people say they can complete them on a PC/laptop but not explain how. I see these tasks every day and do the non-mobile versions so I'd like to do the mobile ones too.

System

#775848 - Judge the sentiment of tweets to cell phone carriers, 6c on NeoBux isn't bad if you don't mind your accuracy taking a hit. I got booted out after 29 tasks and 76% accuracy, but to be fair some of the mistakes were my fault through not concentrating.....

KONG - I just use NeoBux mainly, and Swagbucks. If I'm really bored, I'll do Clixsense or Clickworker, but very infrequently.

Super Trouper - I've only done mobile ones on my phone...I'm not sure you can do them any other way. They were a bit of a faff to set up initially, but after that they're almost as quick as the regular Fisher tasks

Super_Trouper

ok thanks rachelja. My dumpy fingers can't seem to type in my password on my iphone, I swear they make these things fiddly on purpose! I will just have to try to be extra careful!

nickyotron

snowcauldron wrote: »

For recycling to be a worthwhile exercise you need to identify a geniunely bad referral and have him/her replaced by a new referral that is not only a) less bad but b) less bad to a sufficient extent to recover the costs of the recycle.

The trouble is that you're only able to control one side of the coin, so to speak. The other half is luck, although new referrals are supposed to go through a monitoring process ensuring they have registered 11 clicks over the previous 5 days before re-entering circulation.

I never had much luck during the time I manually recycled. I think it probably has a place in smaller accounts, however, where a handful of lazy referrals can have a much more detrimental effect, proportionally. It's very easy to get carried away, however. I'd advise a laser-guided approach, rather than a kitchen-sink-chucking one!

Thanks, Snowcauldron. :money:Think I will go back to the auto recycler now. It's cheaper an like you said there is no way to control the quality you get back for your buck lol
:rotfl:

Listerbelle

Woohoo! I won 50c on the clixgrid

Listerbelle

And, bizarrely today I won 25c on the clixgrid. No wins for ages the two in a row