PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Joint tenancy has ended but one person refuses to leave

Options
2»

Comments

  • jjlandlord wrote: »
    As advised in post #3.

    Blunt but fair :).
    Mornië utulië
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Since the original tenancy did not end on the date the fixed term expired, there is now a Statutory Periodic Tenancy, in joint names.

    A SPT runs monthly (assuming rent is monthly) and can only end in line with those monthly periods - so make sure your notice is sufficient ie not a calender month! See the link below.

    Although a SPT an be ended by either of the joint tenants, it would be politic to make sure the other joint tenant knows you are serving notice, since it will affect them.

    Note Shelter is wrong - you will be liable for rent etc up till the tenancy ends (ie the date your notice expires) not "the date of receipt" (unless the LL agrees of course.

    Ending/Renewing an AST (what happens when the Fixed Term ends?)(What is a Periodic Tenancy?)(How can a LL remove a tenant?)(How can a tenant end a tenancy?)
  • bris
    bris Posts: 10,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    thesaint wrote: »
    If you indeed gave proper notice, the tenancy ended at expiry of the notice.

    The landlord then had the option to go to court with your notice to remove the person in the property.

    You are not liable for rent past the date your notice expired.
    You need to ensure the landlord has your address(retain proof), as he may get a court judgement against you both in your abscence.

    If you receive a claim from the court, you can defend the Sec 21 for the reasons above.
    Yes he is still jointly liable, even though one party gave notice this didn't end liability because the property wasn't vacated. The tenancy doesn't end if the tenants don't leave even just one of them.
  • sinizterguy
    sinizterguy Posts: 1,178 Forumite
    Shelter has assured me that once this notice is received I will only be liable for costs/rent arrears up the date of receipt. Not the best result, but at least I have an definitive answer. Thanks to everyone who replied and I hope this thread might assist others in a similar position.

    Sounds like BS. Logically speaking.

    Legally, they may be right. And you will leave the LL up the creek without a paddle.

    Either way, good luck to you.
  • Cissi
    Cissi Posts: 1,131 Forumite
    jjlandlord wrote: »
    As advised in post #3.


    Yes but some of us were basing our replies on what OP had actually claimed (and which now turns out not to be true):
    I gave the proper one month's notice in writing to end a joint tenancy at the end of its fixed term, which the landlord accepted.
    I gave the proper notice to end the fixed term tenancy, which was accepted by the landlord.


    In any case, even if OP serves correct notice, if ex still refuses to leave then the JOINT tenants would be considered to be overstaying and the LL can charge double rent. I don't see how the OP would no longer be liable?
  • rpc
    rpc Posts: 2,353 Forumite
    The joint tenancy has ended. My ex-partner is effectively squatting.

    No they aren't. They may be holding over but are not squatting.

    One interpretation (see below) is that it doesn't matter whether it is one of you or both of you. "The tenant" (being breaking_free, X-breaking_free and all your stuff) has not left the property.

    How does this:
    I gave the proper one month's notice in writing to end a joint tenancy at the end of its fixed term,
    Compare with this:
    I have not served a valid "Notice to Quit".
    You might be interested to know that Tessa Shepardson disagrees with the advice Shelter have given (and Shelter's own page on the issue says "ending joint tenancies can be complicated" whereas their advice to you seems rather simple).

    She says
    So if Belinda wants to end her liability and serves a notice to quit, this will work if ALL the tenants then leave (assuming the notice was properly drafted and was served after the fixed term had ended). However if Ann, Caroline and Doreen all stay on, then the landlord will still be entitled to his rent, as he has not got vacant possession of his property. Unlike the Local Authority in the example above, he probably won’t want to to go to court to evict anyone.
    My understanding is that Belinda will remain liable for the rent in this situation along with the others, until such time as they all move out or a new tenancy agreement is signed (without Belinda). However if anyone has any legal authority to the contrary, please leave a comment.

    A debate then carries on in the comments which suggests that as long as the notice-giver has left, any rent payments after the end of the tenancy (governed by the NTQ) create a new tenancy for anyone still resident.

    The big question I would be asking is whether a magistrate would get this right (whatever right may be). Barristers and high court judges could probably get to the bottom of it, but a lay magistrate...
  • rpc
    rpc Posts: 2,353 Forumite
    Cissi wrote: »
    LL can charge double rent

    Not any more. Distress of Rent Act 1737 was repealed by Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (effective some time last year).
  • jjlandlord
    jjlandlord Posts: 5,099 Forumite
    edited 10 November 2014 at 6:42PM
    If a valid notice to quit is served (which implies that the tenancy is periodic) there is no question that the tenancy ends on expiry.

    Consequently the (ex-)landlord is not entitled to any rent afterwards. However he is entitled to be compensated if the ex-tenant remains in occupation through "mesne profits" equal to the daily rate of the previous tenancy.

    It is doubtful that the joint-tenants who have vacated would be liable for that, or for double rent.
    rpc wrote: »
    Not any more. Distress of Rent Act 1737 was repealed by Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (effective some time last year).

    It didn't repeal the provision re. double rent.
  • rpc
    rpc Posts: 2,353 Forumite
    jjlandlord wrote: »
    It didn't repeal the provision re. double rent.

    Blummin 'eck - you are right. It repeals every single paragraph of the act, except the double rent one. Masters of obfuscation...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.