We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Missed Connnection - United Airlines

Options
Hello


I've read all of the FAQ but just wanted to check a Cpl of things before I proceed with a claim.
On Friday 24th I travelled Heathrow-Houston-Fort Myers (LHR-IAH-RSW) all with United.
The connection in IAH should have been 1 hr 15 minutes transiting from terminal E to C. However the flight from LHR was delayed by 30 minutes (I believe due to a broken toilet on the incoming service).
To be honest I don't think even if there had been a delay I would have made that connection. I had to clear immigration and re-check bags. By the time I had done this the flight had left 5 minutes prior (and I was still in terminal E).
United did look after me with a hotel, and food however the next flight wasn't until the next day so I was 19 hours late to my final destination (frustrating when you're only going for 3 days!)


So questions -
I have found this address on Uniteds website - United Airlines, Inc.
PO Box 66100
Chicago, IL 60666
United States, would that be the best one?

I have printed my original booking, and reprinted (delayed) boarding passes - anything else I need?

And on the template letter it requests a response within 14 days - I was thinking of amending that to 21 as it will be going overseas.

Finally if I am successful HOW is the compensation paid - cheque? and in which currency?

Many Thanks! Jetlagged scholt
«1

Comments

  • Caz3121
    Caz3121 Posts: 15,833 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 30 October 2014 at 6:30PM
    2 threads to have a good read
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4445417
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5042802

    that was a really crazy connection time to book given that you need to clear immigration and customs at your first point of entry into the USA. I doubt it was ever achievable even if your flight had been on time

    Any further questions should be on the US airlines thread
  • Alan_Bowen
    Alan_Bowen Posts: 4,913 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Unless you booked direct with the airline, I suspect they are going to argue the ticket did not meet the minimum connection time of 90 minutes, which would be pushing it in my view anyway. If this was booked as a single ticket by a travel agent, you might want to talk to them first
  • scholt
    scholt Posts: 245 Forumite
    Alan_Bowen wrote: »
    Unless you booked direct with the airline, I suspect they are going to argue the ticket did not meet the minimum connection time of 90 minutes, which would be pushing it in my view anyway. If this was booked as a single ticket by a travel agent, you might want to talk to them first


    Booked directly with United
  • callum9999
    callum9999 Posts: 4,434 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Alan_Bowen wrote: »
    Unless you booked direct with the airline, I suspect they are going to argue the ticket did not meet the minimum connection time of 90 minutes, which would be pushing it in my view anyway. If this was booked as a single ticket by a travel agent, you might want to talk to them first

    It's hard to tell as it has a confusing number of exceptions, but I don't think the MCT is 90 minutes. From what I can gather, the OP's itinerary seems to meet MCT, and I wouldn't have thought United's system would sell it if it didn't.
  • Alan_Bowen
    Alan_Bowen Posts: 4,913 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If UA sold you a ticket with only 75 minutes to transfer, it does seem to be their problem, I suspect because of flight time changes after booking the transfer time was reduced from the original, but either way, go for it
  • scholt
    scholt Posts: 245 Forumite
    Thank you.
    I'm going to post it this eve - nothing ventured & all that!
  • scholt
    scholt Posts: 245 Forumite
    Well its United 1 scholt 0 at the moment.
    Today I received a very polite letter stating:


    that as my LHR-IAH flight was only delayed 31 minutes my request for compensation is respectfully declined.


    that since my continuation travel delay occurred in the United States on a non community carrier EC261/2004 will not be applicable


    that their legal department carefully reviews all requests for compensation


    but as a tangible gesture of our regret for your delay and misconnect enclosed is an electronic travel certificate valid towards a discount on a future United Airlines flight.....

    soooo

    Point 1 - it is my understanding that it is the delay at the final destination that counts. (19 hours) and this is what I've read on the MSE documents too but can anyone signpost me in the direction of a reference for such.

    Point 2 - if it's a through flight - booked as a whole, on the United website surely it did originate in the EU, again a reference would be very useful.

    and they didn't enclose anything anyway
  • Caz3121
    Caz3121 Posts: 15,833 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    this has been discussed previously on one of the threads linked in post #2 (the regulations appear unclear so you will get nowhere without going to court and I do not believe any of the NWNFs will take on this type of delay)
    following this someone posted on a similar case http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=66952264&postcount=374
    It was at County Court level so does not set a precedence
  • scholt
    scholt Posts: 245 Forumite
    Have got the Folkerts Judgement. Thanks
  • scholt
    scholt Posts: 245 Forumite
    Caz3121 wrote: »
    this has been discussed previously on one of the threads linked in post #2 (the regulations appear unclear so you will get nowhere without going to court and I do not believe any of the NWNFs will take on this type of delay)
    following this someone posted on a similar case http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=66952264&postcount=374
    It was at County Court level so does not set a precedence


    Ah yes, that doesn't sound too hopeful then
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.