We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Housing benefit worked out wrong?
Comments
-
so based on the fact that it only mentions one week at the top of the payslip and the fact that the combined hours are lower than a full time job it is very likely that this looks like, and is being treated like a weekly pay. Does it not break down the hours by week - I guess it appears like you are only submitting a payslip every 2 weeks but there is a missing one in between. Once you have more payslips they will be able to see from the pay to date figures that there is not a payslip in between
Yeah, that's what I was thinking, but if they're aware of it being a fortnightly pay, which they are, why are they treating it as a weekly pay? and no, it just says basic hours: 24, overtime: 10 or whatever less or extra I worked in that period. they're only asking for three though so would that be enough to prove that there isn't a payslip inbetween?0 -
Blackpool_Saver wrote: »Whoever set this up needs shooting
What do you mean?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards