Parking eye. County Court Claim

The_Deep

I am amazed that PE are going ahead with this, I cannot see how they can possibly win.

Judges are human do not have to rigidly follow the law. e law ky the law. They are bound to consider mitigating circumstances, and yours are persuasive, you had a lot of shopping to do and you lost track of time.

You breached a term in a contract which has absolutely no benefit to consumers or shop-owners, and which is solely intended to enrich a parking company.

No one has lost from your overstay, in fact the retailers and service providers

Personally, I would not bother arguing law, I would just go on mitigation and appeal to the Judge;s common sense, but I would make sure that I was properply dress. full uniform of plumed bicorn, Wilkinson sword, frog. and black patent jemimas. (you may have to look that last one up).

Umkomaas

You breached a term in a contract which has absolutely no benefit to consumers of shop-owners, and which is solely intended to enrich a parking company.

Isn't cannibalism a criminal offence? :eek:

Not your finest typing moment TD!

e law ky the law

No one has lost from your overstay, in fact the retailers and service providers .....?

Judge;s common sense

I was properply dress

Appeal drafting fatigue?

The_Deep

I am gad to see that you follow my posts so closely UK

Umkomaas

The_Deep wrote: »

I am gad to see that you follow my posts so closely UK

I always do; always interested in your take on things.

salmosalaris

A two page argument of substance is worth far more than 100+ pages of gumph, there's even the possibility it may get read

salmosalaris

The_Deep wrote: »

I am amazed that PE are going ahead with this, I cannot see how they can possibly win.

Judges are human do not have to rigidly follow the law. e law ky the law. They are bound to consider mitigating circumstances, and yours are persuasive, you had a lot of shopping to do and you lost track of time.

You breached a term in a contract which has absolutely no benefit to consumers or shop-owners, and which is solely intended to enrich a parking company.

No one has lost from your overstay, in fact the retailers and service providers

Personally, I would not bother arguing law, I would just go on mitigation and appeal to the Judge;s common sense, but I would make sure that I was properply dress. full uniform of plumed bicorn, Wilkinson sword, frog. and black patent jemimas. (you may have to look that last one up).

This is risky advice . By all means introduce mitigation to get the court on your side , it's a powerful weapon . However to rely on it is foolhardy , a DJ could decide a case on one of numerous points and to pre-guess which one it may be could be costly . Get the DJ on your side with the justness of your case but also give them a legal peg or two to hang their coat on .

The_Deep

I agree, it is not for everyone, but I would certainly give it a try, if the judge did not buy it I would fall back on the legals. From what I am reading, most judges are now aware of the PPCs' conning ways.

Guys_Dad

The_Deep wrote: »

I agree, it is not for everyone, but I would certainly give it a try, if the judge did not buy it I would fall back on the legals. From what I am reading, most judges are now aware of the PPCs' conning ways.

Different material from me then, Deep. Too many judges are awarding cases on Beavis. Hopefully, after March, sanity may prevail. :beer:

gertysingh

Hey Gurty - follow up on Coupon Mad's advice now - to take some heat off you - as well as ensure you include everyone's take, e.g. if you can show the receipts of the day's shopping/lunch + there was no loss to the landowners. Did PE send you a contract between the landowner and themselves?