We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Ppi

Clerical & Medical Permanent Health Insurance, is this a PPI, if so can I make a claim. Took it out along with an C&M endowment and Halifax mortgage in 1982 -
Dave12

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 1 October 2014 at 9:11PM
    Dave12 wrote: »
    Clerical & Medical Permanent Health Insurance, is this a PPI
    PPI is Payment Protection Insurance which covers loan, credit card or mortgage payments in the event of involuntary unemployment or being incapacitated due to illness.

    Health Insurance is completely different.
    The two are unrelated insurances.

    You can complain about any insurance if it was mis-sold to you. You do have to have valid reasons to do so.

    I fail to see how you could make such a valid case, however.

    1982 was thirty-two years ago.
  • addedvaluebob
    addedvaluebob Posts: 478 Forumite
    edited 2 October 2014 at 12:25PM
    (Text removed by MSE Forum Team)

    PHI policies were designed to pay an income in the event of long term illness preventing an individual from working/earning a living. It is not for covering the cost of medical care.

    If the OP believes they were mis-sold then there is no time limit even if it is a long time ago. The only limit is based on when they ought reasonably to have become aware of the problem or reason for dis-satisfaction
  • addedvaluebob
    addedvaluebob Posts: 478 Forumite
    edited 2 October 2014 at 12:26PM
    PPI pays an income in the event that you cannot meet loan repayments due to illness, redundancy etc PHI pays a replacement income, usually designed to replace a proportion of your income in the event of long term illness or injury preventing you from working they are similar in many aspects.

    (Text removed by MSE Forum Team)
  • roonaldo
    roonaldo Posts: 3,420 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker

    If the OP believes they were mis-sold
    which it wasnt.

    only greed is spurring the OP to post about something that still isnt a PPI policy 32 years later.
  • saver861
    saver861 Posts: 1,408 Forumite
    roonaldo wrote: »
    which it wasnt.

    only greed is spurring the OP to post about something that still isnt a PPI policy 32 years later.

    Well the written word is ambiguous - that we know.

    My reading of the OP is one asking a question. It may not be PPI and there may be no claim whatsoever - and that can be answered with clarity. Assumptions are different.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,294 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    is this a PPI

    No.
    if so can I make a claim

    Only if you are ill. Or do you mean you want to make a complaint?
    If the OP believes they were mis-sold then there is no time limit even if it is a long time ago.

    Yes there is. This is a 1982 case and pre-dates financial services regulation. It would have to have been sold by an agent of Clerical Medical for CM to accept liability for pre-regulation cases. Most Clerical Medical stuff, if not all, was sold via IFAs, accountants and solicitors who only became regulated in 1988.
    Took it out along with an C&M endowment and Halifax mortgage in 1982 -
    Which sounds like excellent advice. Permanent Health insurance policies are considered a cornerstone of any protection insurance. Well done for following that advice.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • We have no idea if this was good advice or not because we don't know anything about the OP's circumstances at the time.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,294 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    We have no idea if this was good advice or not because we don't know anything about the OP's circumstances at the time.

    You rarely come across anyone who doesnt have a financial need for a PHI policy. Most employers cease paying within 12 months.

    However, none of it matters as its not PPI, its pre-regulation from a company that only had used IFAs, accountants and solicitors as its source.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 11,356 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    We can probably guess they were neither immune to illness nor invulnerable not immortal and that a 25 year mortgage wouldn't pay itself.

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • Brokerwise
    Brokerwise Posts: 177 Forumite
    We have no idea if this was good advice or not because we don't know anything about the OP's circumstances at the time.
    Completely and utterly irrelevant to the transaction. There was a possible miss sale due to contract irregularities in the case of Antonio v Shylock................
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.