We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

why are all shares generally tanking? FTSE was 6800+ now 6500

2456712

Comments

  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite

    Is there a new crisis looming????

    No, but there are not many reasons to be particularly bullish.

    There hasn't been a huge amount of positive news recently, but also a lot of mildly negative news.

    A lot of things to be wary of, without much around to lift the sentiment.

    UK manufacturing PMI hits 17-month low in September

    http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/10/01/uk-pmi-manufacturing-britain-idUKKCN0HQ3E920141001

    Asia spooked by weak global data

    http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/10/02/uk-markets-global-idUKKCN0HR01B20141002

    Wall Street tumbles on Ebola fears

    http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/10/01/us-markets-stocks-idUKKCN0HQ3RE20141001

    Yen squeezes higher as disappointing PMIs dim mood

    http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/10/01/us-markets-forex-idUKKCN0HQ5CP20141001
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • officeuk
    officeuk Posts: 51 Forumite
    Mildly negative? I dont think ebola is mildy negative. Profits before lives is a good thing.
  • paddyrg
    paddyrg Posts: 13,543 Forumite
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    I'm glad you're not an investment manager then. :eek:

    RM stock opened at 330p, went to 600p and stuch there a while, then dwindled to 390p today. In that time, the assets, buildings, obligations, employees, contracts, rounds, etc have not actually changed that much. Twitter loses money but has a $50 share price.

    Think about it - investment managers only exist because the share price and a company's 'true' value are only loosely coupled. You would not have had the dotcom bubble if the shares were worth exactly the company's underlying value.

    If you think share prices accurately reflect the minute-by-minute underlying 'value' of a company, forget investment managers, just go for a tracker as there *is* no margin in that world.
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 2 October 2014 at 5:04PM
    There's a few things dampening sentiment at the moment, Hong Kong unrest, Isis bombing and the Ukraine. I see it as a buying opportunity.


    That was probably correct yesterday, but today is entirely down to me, this morning I invested £45k in Vanguard's ftse 100 etf. Be careful everyone because I'll probably be dragging it down further next week when my Halifax cash ISA is switched to a SS ISA (that's if the Halifax eventually manage to get off their backsides and send the money over to Fidelity that is).
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    paddyrg wrote: »
    You would not have had the dotcom bubble if the shares were worth exactly the company's underlying value.

    Private investors were those that drove the DotCom boom. Driven by greed not fundamentals.
  • I understand some ie Tesco, Sainsburys - but it has fallen pretty much every day for over a week now.

    Is there a new crisis looming????

    Everything is tanking, commodities and even crypto like bitcoin. It will be property next, cash is the only king, but even this is risky.

    But when you look at the stock market last few years it has still got a long way to fall.
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 3 October 2014 at 8:09PM
    Everything is tanking, commodities and even crypto like bitcoin. It will be property next, cash is the only king, but even this is risky.

    But when you look at the stock market last few years it has still got a long way to fall.

    The stock market is lower than it was in 1999! It is also lowish on the P/E ratio.


    The ftse 100 went up 1.26% today! The DJ and S&P are currently up a similar % too.


    Cash isn't only not 'king'! it guarantees a loss, with net rates paying below inflation! I only want to hold the absolute minimum in cash. Cash only represents 2% of my portfolio.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • C_Mababejive
    C_Mababejive Posts: 11,668 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Dont panic. It is only the masters of the universe manufacturing drops from which they will profit in the run up to their Christmas binges.
    Feudal Britain needs land reform. 70% of the land is "owned" by 1 % of the population and at least 50% is unregistered (inherited by landed gentry). Thats why your slave box costs so much..
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The stock market is lower than it was in 1999!

    BT share price was £10.60p in December 1999 now £3.80p !

    This doesn't make the share a buy currently.
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 3 October 2014 at 11:32PM
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    BT share price was £10.60p in December 1999 now £3.80p !

    This doesn't make the share a buy currently.

    Did I say it was? That's right, I didn't, I was simply (as you know) responding to this post:

    Everything is tanking, commodities and even crypto like bitcoin. It will be property next, cash is the only king, but even this is risky.

    But when you look at the stock market last few years it has still got a long way to fall.

    If you want to buy into that hysteria, more fool you, good luck putting all your portfolio into cash, I think you'll need all the luck you can get.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.