We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Opinions - what would the masses do?

Bit of a thought exercise, I am approaching a fairly major fork in my path, one where both choices seem less than perfect.

As we try to make sense of it all, it would be helpful to hear another perspective, maybe one I hadn't considered.


Background.
Late twenties spent the last 10 years climbing the career ladder, always looking to advance my career and make myself more employable, married with children so decisions are not taken lightly.


Option 1. Stay with my current very stressful job (several people have left already).
80 mile round trip, but great for the CV and the pay is far above average.
We are not rich, we don't go on holidays etc but the bills get paid every month and we eat out every month without worry.
Take a relocation deal and a pay sweetener that will cut my commute by twenty minutes a day and hope it gets better.

Big but, locked into this job for two years if I stay, this is not an option if I do not leave the company.

Option 2. Take a risk, offered a new job essentially self employed but with one employer, massive step up the career ladder I will not get this chance again.
But the role is not clear and there would be stress to perform and earn commission, this would mean better pay & company car.

Big but here is job security, a new job in a new career with a company that is taking a risk on me.


So, stick with the money and try to make it work.
Or risk it all by taking a better job with no security.


If you have had to do something similar or regret a decision you didn't make it would be interesting to hear.
«1345

Comments

  • Gavin83
    Gavin83 Posts: 8,757 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    How much more money we talking for the second role?

    Presuming I liked the second job and was ready to move on I'd probably take it but then again I don't have a family to support. Leaving a job which is secure and is clearly paying you enough is a big step.
  • diable
    diable Posts: 5,258 Forumite
    Fortune favours the bold,

    Option 2
  • I wouldn't touch Option 2 with a barge pole. 'Essentially self-employed but with one employer' - translation: they are gonna treat you like !!!! and the talk of high earnings is all lies. If it was any good you'd have employed status and basic pay plus commission.
  • robatwork
    robatwork Posts: 7,305 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Option 1, out of those 2.

    And then Option 3 may pop up, or you can go looking for it.
  • option 2......
    With love, POSR <3
  • theoretica
    theoretica Posts: 12,691 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Self employed but with a company car?

    I would check the small print and HMRC very carefully!
    But a banker, engaged at enormous expense,
    Had the whole of their cash in his care.
    Lewis Carroll
  • Both sound terrible to me, I would hate to be in your position, but I'd probably go for option one.
  • KiKi
    KiKi Posts: 5,381 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    Option 1.

    Why? Because Option 2 with only one company presents problems with HMRC. This is often a way for companies to get away with not paying you properly and treating you like crap, and not paying employers NI. You'd have to sort all your own affairs - no sick pay, no leave pay, no job security etc.

    If you were going self employed with a number of companies to work for that would be different. But any company that wants to take you on as SE, and work ONLY for them - there's a reason for that.

    KiKi
    ' <-- See that? It's called an apostrophe. It does not mean "hey, look out, here comes an S".
  • HHarry
    HHarry Posts: 1,012 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    +1 with Kiki, and then keep an eye out for option 3 as Robat said.

    It's not the gamble that's the issue (I went self-employed years ago, and it has been a great decision), but the attitude of the company. Obviously there's not much more security in the first two years of a new job, over being self-employed, but at least there's a commitment to paying NI, pension, holidays and sick.
  • colino
    colino Posts: 5,059 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Option 2 isn't an option at all. I've worked with many people setting up and developing businesses and the majority of the successful ones are those that ran towards the opportunity of running their own enterprise, not one of the many running away from a bad career or worst of all, an alternative to a job following downsizing or redundancy.
    The main benefit of running your own business isn't the money, glamour or fame; it's all about the freedom to do your own thing, make your own choices and run it the way you want to. Your second option is just a dubious way of sub-contracting, swapping one organisations structure for a supposedly different, "better" one.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.