We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Bring Back The GREENBACK Party
Comments
-
Look, I've obviously joined the wrong forum. This will be my last post so here goes.
about the physical impossiblity of repaying the debt. Imagine this....
If the country has no money whatsoever not a penny.
It borrows 10 pounds off the Bank of England at 5% for 1 year
at the end of the year we give that 10 pounds back, but where do we get the extra 50p from to cover the 5%. WE CAN;T because there is only £10 pounds in existence.
Now take that and multiply it by 60 or so million people in this country and you get a debt of 1.1TRILLION that you slave away in taxes to pay the interest on.
So as you can see, it is IMPOSSIBLE to pay it back,
There are only 3 or 4 countries which now exist that dont have a central bank and use this system of enslavement.
Libya was one of those countries prior to 2011. It issued its own currency at 0% and was bombed out of existence for this very fact (plus it was trying to set up a new african currency based on the dinar).
If you don't believe me thats fine, I don't mind.
But to say the Bank of England isn't a private institution just like the Federal reserve then we really have no hope.0 -
SpammyTheSpammer wrote: »stick 2 pencils up your nose and say "Wibble" to everything. THEN you will understand.....
You forgot to stick a pair of underpants on your head:DGeorge_Orwell wrote: »Look, I've obviously joined the wrong forum.
At last your talking sense :rotfl:0 -
George_Orwell wrote: »Hello one and all.
For anyone who doesn't understand central banking, it is PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for the U.K to pay back its current debt of 1.1 TRILLION pounds.
4 men in history have tried to sidestep central banking by abolishing USURY/INTEREST, some with more success than others.
These men are Abraham Lincoln who issued GREENBACK dollars to fund the civil war. He was assassinated for this act.
Adolf Hitler who issued Labour Treasury Certificates in exchange for labour, to get the country back on its feet after the repercussions of the Versailles treaty. World War II was started because of this (despite what you read in the newspapers or what you were taught at school).
J.F.K issued 4.3 BILLION dollars worth of silver certificates in June 1963 using executive order 11110 (look it up) at no interest.
5 months later he was assassinated also.
And finally again despite what you read in the newspapers Col Gaddafi issued his own debt free currency for years which improved healthcare, education and created what Libyans call the 8th wonder of the world.
A complete irrigation system covering the entire country in the desert.
As you know he was bombed out of existence also.
As a side note, this country did it also by issuing Bradbury pounds to fund WWI but David Lloyd George caved in to the central bankers and went back to the status quo.
I am trying to start a new political party in the U.K which aims to do exactly the same as these 4 men. Issue currency with no INTEREST attached. Im sure you can all figure out the advantages of this system compared to what we have already.
Im looking for 300-500 candidates who are prepared to fight for this change and make this country great again.
.facebook.com/groups/1531359567098085/
Have I just heard you on Radio Scotland and 5 live?
WR0 -
Oddly, people create or add value whenever they grow, make or create something, which is reflected by the amount of money in circulation. Which isn't to say there aren't major problems with the way the current financial systems operate (in my view when the money creation isn't related to any actual useful activity) - but to suggest that money can't and shouldn't be created is to misunderstand what money is.0
-
George_Orwell wrote: »....But to say the Bank of England isn't a private institution just like the Federal reserve then we really have no hope.
I'm happy to state that the Bank of England is indeed "a private institution just like the Federal reserve". On the grounds that both institutions are in fact owned by their respective governments.
I'd be interested to find out, given that you believe that they are private institutions, who you think actually owns them. The illuminati? A secret cabal of lizard beings from another planet? Sadly, given that was your last post, it seems that we shall never know.0 -
I couldn't resist.
Just for all you people who are prepared to check history rather than rely on their own misinfomed beliefs, just check out how the Rothchilds came into possession of the Bank of England, by knowing the result of the Battle of Waterloo before anybody else, therefore making informed decisions on the stock market which nobody else was privy to.
Then check out their link to the American civil war and how the Federal reserve was created.
"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws" Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild
[SIZE=+1]As Napoleon pointed out: "Terrorism, War & Bankruptcy are caused by the privatization of money, issued as a debt and compounded by interest "- he cancelled debt and interest in France - hence the Battle of Waterloo.
[/SIZE][SIZE=+1]Nathan Rothschild said (1777-1836): "I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire. The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire and I control the British money supply." [/SIZE]0 -
George_Orwell wrote: »I couldn't resist.
Just for all you people who are prepared to check history rather than rely on their own misinfomed beliefs, just check out how the Rothchilds came into possession of the Bank of England, by knowing the result of the Battle of Waterloo before anybody else, therefore making informed decisions on the stock market which nobody else was privy to.....[SIZE=+1] [/SIZE]
Good grief? What was it that the government purchased in 1946?
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/9-10/27/contentsGeorge_Orwell wrote: »...Then check out their link to the American civil war and how the Federal reserve was created.....
Ah I see. It's the great Rothschild Conspiracy. But is this the Rothschild Illuminati version of the conspiracy, or is it the Rothschild Zionist version of the conspiracy?George_Orwell wrote: »...
"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws" Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild
[SIZE=+1]As Napoleon pointed out: "Terrorism, War & Bankruptcy are caused by the privatization of money, issued as a debt and compounded by interest "- he cancelled debt and interest in France - hence the Battle of Waterloo.
[/SIZE][SIZE=+1]Nathan Rothschild said (1777-1836): "I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire. The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire and I control the British money supply." [/SIZE]
Those are all fictious quotes. Just because they get repeated ad nauseam on just about every conspiracy website out there on the interweb does not make them true.0 -
I am a cow so cannot speak Bullshine but I do recognise its smell when I come upon it.0
-
I have just looked out of the winding gear window at the Salt mine and aliens have landed.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards