We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Delete post

13567

Comments

  • Cornucopia
    Cornucopia Posts: 16,554 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    specialboy wrote: »
    Where does it say its a legal requirement to give a key to the landlord?

    In the tenancy agreement.
  • quidsy
    quidsy Posts: 2,181 Forumite
    Which is unenforceable without a court order.
    I don't respond to stupid so that's why I am ignoring you.

    2015 £2 saver #188 = £45
  • Cornucopia
    Cornucopia Posts: 16,554 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    silvercar wrote: »
    Everyone needs to be aware that this is a forum, so opinions are just that. And often don't mirror people's behaviour in real life.

    Yes... but it would be better if people didn't speculate about things that have a definitive answer, if they know they don't know that definitive answer.
    The OP gave permission for access, not for the landlord to allow unsupervised access to a third party.
    Professional agents of the Landlord are, well, agents of the Landlord. The question is whether those Agents are behaving reasonably. If the Tenant believes that they are not, then the appropriate action is to complain to the Landlord, and/or the Manager of the Estate Agent's Company.
    Personally, if I need someone to access my let property I ask the tenants permission to pass on their phone number and tell the tenant who to expect a call from, then arrange for the 3rd party to arrange a time direct with the tenant.
    Sounds great.

    I'd also expect a professional Estate Agent to be able to effect a professional introduction to the Tenants. Who knows, they might be looking for a new property?
  • Cornucopia
    Cornucopia Posts: 16,554 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    quidsy wrote: »
    Which is unenforceable without a court order.

    And your point is?

    The issue is whether it is an appropriate action to take, not what the steps are to enforcement after the event.
  • mrginge
    mrginge Posts: 4,843 Forumite
    Cornucopia wrote: »
    In the tenancy agreement.

    Well a couple of points to mention

    1. You haven't read the tenancy agreement.
    2. You have no idea whether such a clause would be enforceable even if it did exist.


    So your original statement of -
    Cornucopia wrote: »
    If you change the locks, you are legally required to give keys to the Landlord. It is a pointless gesture.

    Is, in fact completely wrong.
  • Cornucopia
    Cornucopia Posts: 16,554 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    mrginge wrote: »
    Well a couple of points to mention

    1. You haven't read the tenancy agreement.
    2. You have no idea whether such a clause would be enforceable even if it did exist.
    No effective Tenancy Agreement would not have such a clause.

    So your original statement of -

    Is, in fact completely wrong.
    I find it sad that people would apparently be happy to sign a contract knowing that there are clauses within it that they would not honour if/when the time came.

    A contract is a legally-enforceable contract. There is no getting away from that. If you don't want to abide by its not unreasonable requirements, don't take the tenancy.
  • quidsy
    quidsy Posts: 2,181 Forumite
    An agreement could state that the tenant must stand at a certain window for 45 seconds each day doing semaphore, it still wouldn't be enforceable.
    I don't respond to stupid so that's why I am ignoring you.

    2015 £2 saver #188 = £45
  • jjlandlord
    jjlandlord Posts: 5,099 Forumite
    quidsy wrote: »
    An agreement could state that the tenant must stand at a certain window for 45 seconds each day doing semaphore, it still wouldn't be enforceable.

    I don't see why it wouldn't be valid if properly drafted.

    The issue would be to work out what the loss to the landlord could possibly be if the tenant was to breach that term.
  • Cornucopia
    Cornucopia Posts: 16,554 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    This is getting ridiculous.

    Under all circumstances, the Landlord has a right to undertake repairs with the permission of the Tenant and with 24 hours' notice.

    If the locks had been changed and keys were not provided, and this threatened to be an issue, then I would use that right to change the locks again, with the cost being deducted from the Deposit.

    Any practical issues about unauthorised access during times when the property is occupied are easily resolved with a door-chain or similar device. It would be an interesting test case were a Court asked to rule on whether someone is entitled to "quiet enjoyment" of the property even when they are not there.
  • pinkshoes
    pinkshoes Posts: 20,607 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    antrobus wrote: »
    But that's only your interpretation of the law, and your opinion.:rotfl:

    Nope, it's not my opinion, it's from the Landlord and Tenant act. A government written legislation.

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/70

    Some bedtime reading for you.

    A lot of my friends are LLs, and they give their tenants at least 24 hours written notice if they need access, and this is only to carry out necessary repairs that the tenant is happy to be done.

    Obviously the exception is emergency repairs where the tenant must allow access.

    When it comes to changing over tenants, they only do viewings at the tenants convenience and agreement, and they are well aware that the tenant can refuse.

    Hence it always pays to be nice to your tenants!
    Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
    Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')

    No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.