Lost to PE in Court Today: Had to happen sooner or later!

Guys_Dad

Buzby wrote: »

Coming from you, that is indeed a compliment.

Now explain to me, and anyone else interested how two signs stating different points, makes one valid and the other not? This is contract law and requires offer and acceptance. There has been none - so the landowner is within his rights to prohibit access.

Should they not do so, there can be no expectation of any acceptance, making success for them even more problematic.

Buy hey - if you want to roll over and play their gMe, you just go right on.

You missed the point.

You devised a number plate that you believed would help with parking tickets. But then you spelled CONTRACTUAL incorrectly!!!

I await with interest you posting details of a parking adjudication that you have won as a result of your silver bullet Reg plates.

bazster

Guys_Dad wrote: »

You missed the point.

You devised a number plate that you believed would help with parking tickets. But then you spelled CONTRACTUAL incorrectly!!!

I await with interest you posting details of a parking adjudication that you have won as a result of your silver bullet Reg plates.

He did say earlier that he's never had a court case against him, so obviously his number plates work. It's got nothing to do with him being in Scotland, of course.

GingerBob_3

Guys_Dad wrote: »

You missed the point.

You devised a number plate that you believed would help with parking tickets. But then you spelled CONTRACTUAL incorrectly!!!

I await with interest you posting details of a parking adjudication that you have won as a result of your silver bullet Reg plates.

Sounds like the silver bullet means it never gets that far, but I'm intrigued by the idea of the number plates.

Guys_Dad

bazster wrote: »

He did say earlier that he's never had a court case against him, so obviously his number plates work. It's got nothing to do with him being in Scotland, of course.

Have you missed off some emotions here??

Umkomaas

Buzby wrote: »

Coming from you, that is indeed a compliment.

Now explain to me, and anyone else interested how two signs stating different points, makes one valid and the other not? This is contract law and requires offer and acceptance. There has been none - so the landowner is within his rights to prohibit access.

Should they not do so, there can be no expectation of any acceptance, making success for them even more problematic.

Buy hey - if you want to roll over and play their gMe, you just go right on.

It might be cheaper for you to pay the £100 PCN rather than stump up the £1,000 fine for illegal number plates. Have you read the minimum standards?

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/327622/INF104_230913.pdf

Section 6 covers them.

bazster

Guys_Dad wrote: »

Have you missed off some emotions here??

Yes.....

bod1467

Umkomaas wrote: »

It might be cheaper for you to pay the £100 PCN rather than stump up the £1,000 fine for illegal number plates. Have you read the minimum standards?

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/327622/INF104_230913.pdf

Section 6 covers them.

Who's to say his plates (if they actually even exist) weren't supplied by an RNPS? Section 6 doesn't stop additional text appearing below the registration, as long as the remainder of the plates are to standard. (If this was disallowed then almost every vehicle on the road would be non-compliant, having as most do the name of the dealership the vehicle came from).

ampersand

Normally by this point, someone would have firmly, politely, advised Buzby to start his own Thread and not hi-jack bargepole's.

Buzby, you know how to start a Thread, j'assume?

GingerBob_3

bod1467 wrote: »

Who's to say his plates (if they actually even exist) weren't supplied by an RNPS? Section 6 doesn't stop additional text appearing below the registration, as long as the remainder of the plates are to standard. (If this was disallowed then almost every vehicle on the road would be non-compliant, having as most do the name of the dealership the vehicle came from).

That is correct. If fact, as an alternative you could have a small notice stuck in your front and back windows.

bazster

bod1467 wrote: »

Who's to say his plates (if they actually even exist) weren't supplied by an RNPS? Section 6 doesn't stop additional text appearing below the registration, as long as the remainder of the plates are to standard. (If this was disallowed then almost every vehicle on the road would be non-compliant, having as most do the name of the dealership the vehicle came from).

Well the picture he's shown us don't have the BS number or identify the RNPS, which makes them non-compliant.

Mind you, I've been running non-compliant plates on one of my motorcycles for 11 years (there's no room for a compliant plate) and I've never been stopped.