We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Lost to PE in Court Today: Had to happen sooner or later!

24567

Comments

  • Stroma
    Stroma Posts: 7,971 Forumite
    Uniform Washer
    bazster wrote: »
    PoPLA is a kangaroo court and part of the scam. Or do you want to argue otherwise?

    I agree and have said from the start it's not fit for purpose! But an appeal there can get these scam tickets cancelled with the right wording.
    When posting a parking issue on MSE do not reveal any information that may enable PPCs to identify you. They DO monitor the forum.
    We don't need the following to help you.
    Name, Address, PCN Number, Exact Date Of Incident, Date On Invoice, Reg Number, Vehicle Picture, The Time You Entered & Left Car Park, Or The Amount of Time You Overstayed.
    :beer: Anti Enforcement Hobbyist Member :beer:
  • Stroma
    Stroma Posts: 7,971 Forumite
    Uniform Washer
    bargepole wrote: »
    In some cases, this results in Judges awarding full costs for unreasonable behaviour. So that's another £250 on top of the claimed amount.

    I would take that with a large pinch of salt, it suits their cases for something like this to be reported on fora like this. Also if this is the case why aren't parking eye stung in the same fashion when it's they with the unreasonable behaviour ?
    When posting a parking issue on MSE do not reveal any information that may enable PPCs to identify you. They DO monitor the forum.
    We don't need the following to help you.
    Name, Address, PCN Number, Exact Date Of Incident, Date On Invoice, Reg Number, Vehicle Picture, The Time You Entered & Left Car Park, Or The Amount of Time You Overstayed.
    :beer: Anti Enforcement Hobbyist Member :beer:
  • Hot_Bring
    Hot_Bring Posts: 1,596 Forumite
    bazster wrote: »
    PoPLA is a kangaroo court and part of the scam. Or do you want to argue otherwise?


    The word BECAUSE was very key in my post !
    "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." - Dante Alighieri
  • bazster wrote: »
    PoPLA is a kangaroo court and part of the scam. Or do you want to argue otherwise?


    Yep quite happy to argue otherwise given that the option of ignoring the appeals process open with litigious parking companies such as Parking Eye will almost certainly give rise to the motorist receiving a court claim.

    Parking Eye are closing the gap on the time between parking charges being issued -( for those that are ignoring ) and then issuing court claim forms.

    Whilst POPLA is not perfect it is the appeals process currently on offer and the decision is ONLY binding on the operator.

    As I said before on another thread - POPLA is far fairer and more transparent that the IPC IAS appeals system.
  • Off the top of my head, PE issue ~700,000 fake parking fines a year, about 30% of which are paid, leaving ~500,000 unpaid, of which the number appealed to POPLA is insignificant. Assuming that they are still issuing ~1000 county court claims a week, that is only ~50,000 a year or 1 in 10 of those who refuse to pay.

    A 1 in 10 chance does not equate to almost certainly. Presumably coincidentally, it just about makes it worthwhile paying £16 to make it go away.

    However, that does not mean that ignoring and relying on templates is the best solution in every case, but it also does not mean that it is not the best solution in some cases. Some people will not get involved in disputes, lodge appeals, etc., and cannot or will not do the research to do anything more than rely on templates. A 1 in 10 chance (assuming the most litigious PPC at their most litigious) of losing £150 if they are taken to court and either lose or default makes more sense than folding and paying £85.
  • Stroma
    Stroma Posts: 7,971 Forumite
    Uniform Washer
    The simple fact is if everyone ignore these invoices completely the whole business will fall on its face, ignore is an option providing you know all the pitfalls as well as pluses in doing so.
    When posting a parking issue on MSE do not reveal any information that may enable PPCs to identify you. They DO monitor the forum.
    We don't need the following to help you.
    Name, Address, PCN Number, Exact Date Of Incident, Date On Invoice, Reg Number, Vehicle Picture, The Time You Entered & Left Car Park, Or The Amount of Time You Overstayed.
    :beer: Anti Enforcement Hobbyist Member :beer:
  • jkdd77
    jkdd77 Posts: 271 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Apart from anything else, I think that this OP was particularly unfortunate, given that it sounds like no breach occurred whatsoever, and that OP never had any real chance to appeal to POPLA.
  • Buzby
    Buzby Posts: 8,275 Forumite
    edited 15 August 2014 at 9:01AM
    Since most of these cases depend on signage, providing your own negates and repudiates the establishment of a contract, as the burden of risk shifts.

    My VRM has a line at the bottom that states: "No contractural obligations accepted or implied". This answers any claim that being in the car park means an agreement to terms I probably was unaware of. Since my rejection has equal standing to theirs, it is up to the PPC to take issue with my modifying term and ask me to leave. Since most use ANPR, this won't happen - which is their loss.

    The fact the ANPR cannot read my rejection is an irrelevance - it does not make their case any stronger. When required I respond to any PPC letters with a blow up image of the term - in some cases the begging letter chain stops, in others it runs full term but Court? Nope.

    561a0d539d516754c17050076217b584_zps010eda7e.jpg
  • Guys_Dad
    Guys_Dad Posts: 11,025 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    bazster wrote: »
    PoPLA is a kangaroo court and part of the scam. Or do you want to argue otherwise?

    Well, given the successes we are getting at POPLA as compared to the blind following of the Beavis case by some judges, I would rather take my chances with a kangaroo than a mole-rat,
  • bod1467
    bod1467 Posts: 15,214 Forumite
    Contractural is not a valid word, therefore your signage is meaningless. ;)

    (Contractual is what you meant)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.