We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
The Forum is currently experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
PPI Dixons finance provider 1980s

Aurora_B
Posts: 2 Newbie
Could anyone tell me who the finance provider was for Dixons in 1980s? I contacted Dixons legal dept and they told me to contact the finance provider but couldn't tell me who they were and said I should Google it! No luck there. Many thanks.
0
Comments
-
Could anyone tell me who the finance provider was for Dixons in 1980s?
What exactly are you wanting to complain about, thirty years on?0 -
Thanks for enlightening me on this. I was advised to look into it as I know I had paid some kind of PPI at the time but I didn't realise that it pre-dated the legislation. Case closed then!0
-
I was advised to look into it as I know I had paid some kind of PPI at the time but I didn't realise that it pre-dated the legislation.
Only very robust mis-selling complaints, with full and comprehensive documentation, have even a chance of being upheld if they are this old.0 -
Moneyineptitude wrote: »If your complaint has been with a Bank, then they would have had to consider any complaint. However, even a bank would be hard pressed to have records stretching back THIRTY YEARS about "some kind of PPI"
Only very robust mis-selling complaints, with full and comprehensive documentation, have even a chance of being upheld if they are this old.0 -
Moneyineptitude wrote: »neither Dixons nor the finance provider would have to even consider your concerns.Moneyineptitude wrote: »If your complaint has been with a Bank, then they would have had to consider any complaint.magpiecottage wrote: »But the complaint is not against the bank but against the seller - i.e. Dixons Retail Group. They cannot be pursued via FOS
Yes, exactly as I already pointed out at post #2 of this thread (quoted above). My point was that the OP was "advised" to complain, probably because Banks would still have to consider any complaint even after thirty years.
I think the OP already got that message!:p0 -
Moneyineptitude wrote: »Banks would still have to consider any complaint even after thirty years.
In addition, they only need to consider it if the original lender was a member of the scheme at the time of the sale.
That is why Santander has to consider some historic complaints but not others.0 -
magpiecottage wrote: »Actually, they don't because the Banking Ombudsman scheme only started in 1986 - 28 years ago!0
-
For information in the 80's Dixons used either Lombard Tricity finance or Club 24 (which was owned by Hepworths the tailoring company). Club 24 ran the store card and did some of the loans. Lombard Tricity did unsecured personal loans for things like TV's.
I know because I worked for Dixons in the mid 80's.
Learn from the mistakes of others - you won't live long enough to make them all yourself.0 -
For information in the 80's Dixons used either Lombard Tricity finance or Club 24 (which was owned by Hepworths the tailoring company). Club 24 ran the store card and did some of the loans. Lombard Tricity did unsecured personal loans for things like TV's.
Thanks for the information, but, as the 1980's are around twenty years prior to the regulation of general insurance, any mis-selling complaint is doomed to failure. In addition, do you really think either lombard Tricity Finance or Club24 will still have any records of thirty-year-old finance?0 -
I remember buying a Betamax video in the 80's from Dixons using Club24 credit.
Now if that wasn't mis-selling I don't know what was!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 242.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards