Court found in my favour

rdr

Why do PPCs persist with all caps signs?
It was one of Martin Cutt's points that they are harder read and so make it hoarder to argue that a contract has been formed, you would have thought it would be a easy gain for them.
I guess most of them never got on to joined up writing.

trisontana

And this:-

Stephen Hall asked for a gagging condition on paying the defendant's expenses, but Judge Birkby informed him the case was in the public domain.

Why on earth did Hall think the judge would ever comply with his request? What have UKCPS got to hide?

trisontana

The "walking off site" bit is pure nonsense . Does it apply to both the driver and any passengers? what if just one passenger leaves site but the driver goes into the shops on site. What if the driver just wants to leave site for a minute of so to go to a cash machine across the road?

Then you have the twelve year-old child rule. Have UKCPS got some mechanism for determining the age of a child?

bazster

trisontana wrote: »

And this:-

Stephen Hall asked for a gagging condition on paying the defendant's expenses, but Judge Birkby informed him the case was in the public domain.

Why on earth did Hall think the judge would ever comply with his request? What have UKCPS got to hide?

The fact that they've got moronic, nonsensical, illiterate signs all over the place?

bazster

trisontana wrote: »

The "walking off site" bit is pure nonsense . Does it apply to both the driver and any passengers? what if just one passenger leaves site but the driver goes into the shops on site. What if the driver just wants to leave site for a minute of so to go to a cash machine across the road?

I can just see this in front of a judge:

"The driver did not walk off-site, the driver remained in the vehicle the whole time."

"Yes but the passenger walked off-site."

"So sue the passenger then. Oh, you can't, because the passenger didn't enter into any contract."

Case dismissed.

Hot_Bring

trisontana wrote: »

Then you have the twelve year-old child rule. Have UKCPS got some mechanism for determining the age of a child?

They could use the ridiculous system an "Eat As Much As You Like" restaurant has near me - if you're 12 or over you pay full price for the set menu. How do they decide if you're 12 ? They measure your height !!!!

Coupon-mad

trisontana wrote: »

And this:-

Stephen Hall asked for a gagging condition on paying the defendant's expenses, but Judge Birkby informed him the case was in the public domain.

Why on earth did Hall think the judge would ever comply with his request? What have UKCPS got to hide?

Really like DJ Birkby's style at Sheffield, what with this case and the other ParkingEye one I linked above where the defendant didn't even need to speak!

Umkomaas

trisontana wrote: »

The "walking off site" bit is pure nonsense . Does it apply to both the driver and any passengers? what if just one passenger leaves site but the driver goes into the shops on site. What if the driver just wants to leave site for a minute of so to go to a cash machine across the road?

Then you have the twelve year-old child rule. Have UKCPS got some mechanism for determining the age of a child?

Oor Trev's currently working on one of his mathematical angryrythms for this; be patient!