We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Help! what would you do?
Comments
-
He needs to check the order. Normally this would refer to something such as 'leaving full time secondary education' in which case he may have a strong argument that the liability ended when they each dropped out. If he choses to support them in their efforts to return to education then it may be better for him to do so directly, rather than via their mum.
Depending on the courses they are taking the college may be further rather than secondary education in any event.
We could give better advice if you were to post the wording of the court order.
However, it sounds as though your partner would benefit from speaking to a solicitor. He may be able to find one who offers a free initial consultation - he will get more out of it f he takes a copy of the financial order with him, and if he is clear about exactly what his ex is asking for.All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)0 -
Assuming there is some equity in the house, he needs to WRITE to her, stating that if she does not allow exchange of contracts then completion to happen, as agreed in the divorce settlement, he will employ a solicitor to force the sale of the house, then the cost of the solicitor and will be deducted from her share of the equity.Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0 -
Unless it specified that he would support them until the end of university education the normal expectation would be support until they were 20 (which is when CSA ceased to be paid under the old rules) Support until the end of the academic year when they were 20 might be on the cards.
She has NO incentive to leave and presumably hopes that since he needs to sell up she can negoitate a higher percentage of the house sale in order to get her agreement to go?
What percentage split is in the financial settlement?
The support was specified until the end secondary education which as you said was june last year however it also specified that he would pay until the house was sold. Which means it's in her benefit to stay as there is hardly any equity in the house and she will have to go into rented accommodation. The equity is split equally. My partner offered her all the equity a year ago if she moved out quickly.0 -
Sounds like a nasty situation.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
