We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Affordable Housing - Can it be done?

12345679»

Comments

  • CB1979_2
    CB1979_2 Posts: 1,335 Forumite
    I guess it's debatable as to whether they will suffer unjustly, as there are clear indicators that the market has peaked. It's not inside information and they didn't HAVE to buy, despite many having a mindset that they do.


    yet all these non-homeowners HAVE to own?

    VERY hypocrtical!
  • Mmmm, can we do the same with Mercedes cars?

    Dropping prices would not necessarily make homes more affordable. For example, lower prices coupled with lower wages or higher ineterest rates would nor impact affordability. The equation is more complex than 1 + 1 = 2.

    Supply and demand. Prices are driven by demand. there is too much demand for too few houses. Reduce demand by killing off a significant proportion of the popuation (bird flu/war?) or by encouraging people to share homes (marriage tax breaks/lodger schemes/zero Stamp Duty when downsizing?) or by limiting immigration/encouraging emigration. Increase supply by making best use of current housing stock, redeploying large businesses more evenly or building more houses.

    Whatever else, interest rates are not the answer. They will produce cheaper houses but they are not likely to be significantly more affordable.

    Increase wages. Whatever happens to wages will not increase affordability for the masses. If we all were awarded a 50% rise tomorrow, house prices would rise accordingly and there would still be those who could not afford to live where they wish.

    Build more houses is the obvious answer. Make them council owned and protected from right to buy. But don't mix the estates with private homes as this rarely pleases either tenants or owners. Affordable rents rather than affordable homes is the way ahead.

    :)

    GG

    That old chestnut again = shortage of supply.

    Shortage of supply is a red herring /wild goose chase as to the cause of hpi. Explain why prices World-wide have risen, using the "shortage of supply" red herring statement.

    As for if prices were lower, they wont be affordable.
    Tell me how it was affordable towards the end of the 90's with higher rates, & now they're not affordable today with lower rates.


    The crux of it is: Money supply, debt expansion & Low rates.

    Take any of the above away and the market is fooked.
  • For me there are 2 main reasons for high house prices.

    The rich londoners with their multiple homes that are left idle for long periods. Forcing FTBs out of their local area. It gauks me to think that in some areas they get reduced council tax due to them being a second home. They should pay the same as everyone else for every home they own. They don't turn the street light outside ther 2nd home while they're off in London.

    But the biggest issue is Buy to let. I heard yesterday that they get tax breaks for BTLs!! A lot of the flats and BTB house are marketed as FTB/investment. no sooner do you go and look at a property than it's been snapped up by someone who can make a profit by buying so can afford to pay the asking price!!

    The reality is house prices aren't going to fall any time soon.(in my opinion)
    How about poeople who want to invest in property (The government can't start doing things to undermine the capitalist economy. Forcing people out of business) invest in shared ownership schemes. Give them loads of tax breaks and sting the ones who insist on private teneants.


    Put a legal limit on how much people can borrow. Someone said this and it is a good idea.:beer:

    As for Guy_montag. He doesn't want people "breeding" Okay But who's gonna wipe his bum when he is sat gibbering in an old peoples home???:p
    "A goldfish left Lincoln logs in me sock drawer!"

    "That's the story of JESUS."
  • Guy_Montag
    Guy_Montag Posts: 2,291 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    For me there are 2 main reasons for high house prices.

    The rich londoners with their multiple homes that are left idle for long periods. Forcing FTBs out of their local area. It gauks me to think that in some areas they get reduced council tax due to them being a second home. They should pay the same as everyone else for every home they own. They don't turn the street light outside ther 2nd home while they're off in London.

    But the biggest issue is Buy to let. I heard yesterday that they get tax breaks for BTLs!! A lot of the flats and BTB house are marketed as FTB/investment. no sooner do you go and look at a property than it's been snapped up by someone who can make a profit by buying so can afford to pay the asking price!!

    The reality is house prices aren't going to fall any time soon.(in my opinion)
    How about poeople who want to invest in property (The government can't start doing things to undermine the capitalist economy. Forcing people out of business) invest in shared ownership schemes. Give them loads of tax breaks and sting the ones who insist on private teneants.


    Put a legal limit on how much people can borrow. Someone said this and it is a good idea.:beer:

    As for Guy_montag. He doesn't want people "breeding" Okay But who's gonna wipe his bum when he is sat gibbering in an old peoples home???:p
    I hope to be euthanased around that time - montag flavoured Soylent green anyone?
    "Mrs. Pench, you've won the car contest, would you like a triumph spitfire or 3000 in cash?" He smiled.
    Mrs. Pench took the money. "What will you do with it all? Not that it's any of my business," he giggled.
    "I think I'll become an alcoholic," said Betty.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.