UK CPS ticket, help?

Coupon-mad

Yes -and you could add it now:

The Notice to Keeper is a nullity because it fails to 'repeat the information on the PCN' (because the registration number has been changed). An Operator cannot make such a fundamental amendment and have certainly thrown away any chance of 'keeper liability' in doing so. A Council would have had to cancel such a flawed PCN and UKCPS have no grounds to proceed and should cancel.

By the way I have changed the NEWBIES template to refresh it and surprise PPC World with a new version! UKCPS usually cancelled any PCN when they saw the 'old version' so I expect they will fold now as well, especially in your case where they are clearly on a hiding to nothing.

to6y

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Yes -and you could add it now:

The Notice to Keeper is a nullity because it fails to 'repeat the information on the PCN' (because the registration number has been changed). An Operator cannot make such a fundamental amendment and have certainly thrown away any chance of 'keeper liability' in doing so. A Council would have had to cancel such a flawed PCN and UKCPS have no grounds to proceed and should cancel.

By the way I have changed the NEWBIES template to refresh it and surprise PPC World with a new version! UKCPS usually cancelled any PCN when they saw the 'old version' so I expect they will fold now as well, especially in your case where they are clearly on a hiding to nothing.

Awesome, thankyou! Should I simply copy what you have just said and add it into the template or write my own argument? I find it difficult to state that the VRN is incorrect without admitting that I am in possession of the ticket, therefore implying that I was the driver?

I was thinking of adding something like this under [FONT=&quot]"[/FONT][FONT=&quot]This is my appeal and all liability to your company is denied on the following basis:"

[/FONT][FONT=&quot]D) [/FONT][FONT=&quot]The Notice to Keeper is a nullity because it fails to 'repeat the information on the PCN.’ The Vehicle Registration Number on the actual "ticket" (invoice) is written as “XXXX XYX” whilst on the Notice To Keeper, it is written as “XXXX XXX.” An Operator cannot make such a fundamental amendment and you have certainly thrown away any chance of 'keeper liability' in doing so. A Council would have had to cancel such a flawed PCN and therefore you have no grounds to proceed.[/FONT]

Coupon-mad

Perfect, and you have not implied who was driving, merely that you have seen the PCN. After all, it's your car so why would you not have seen it at some point, whoever was driving?!

to6y

Awesome, I'll get that printed and in the post tomorrow then! Cheers for the help, much appreciated. I will update this thread with the result when I receive a response to my appeal :T