We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
3 executors - does majority rule?
Options
flossy_splodge
Posts: 2,544 Forumite


There are three siblings all executors and joint and equal beneficiaries.
Can any two out of the three go ahead and eg sell the house if the third won't agree price and if not what happens about a stalemate?
Thanks:o
Can any two out of the three go ahead and eg sell the house if the third won't agree price and if not what happens about a stalemate?
Thanks:o
0
Comments
-
I suspect it depends
what does it say in the will.
default
I think in England and wales needs agreement of all
I think in Scotland needs majority
No idea for Northern Ireland.
One approach if they want more it tell them if they think it is worth more buy it and sell it themselves.
If just disagreeing about an asking price point out until they have offers on the table you are all guessing.0 -
Since all three of them would need to sign the contract to sell and the Land Registry paperwork they really need to agree.
If things become impossible due to lack of agreement then the two would have to apply to get the other removed as Executor, which would be longwinded and costly.
They need to talk things over and as getmore said, if it's just disagreeing without firm figures then look to sort that out first. Getting more than one appraisal is helpful, particularly if the one executor organises one so they can get the information straight from the estate agent/valuer.:heartpuls Daughter born January 2012 :heartpuls Son born February 2014 :heartpuls
Slimming World ~ trying to get back on the wagon...0 -
Actually its the same in England and Wales as Scotland. It depends on the will. If the will states they cant act separately and severally then it only needs one to make the decision however if the will maker says all must agree then that is the case. It is however always better to have all three agree
Rob0 -
Actually its the same in England and Wales as Scotland. It depends on the will. If the will states they cant act separately and severally then it only needs one to make the decision however if the will maker says all must agree then that is the case. It is however always better to have all three agree
Rob
What's the default if the will does not say either way?0 -
AIUI the default is all must agree
Rob0 -
Numerous links say that for confirmation in Scotland majority is the default.
The only reference I found for E&W was the estates act that seems to require agreement by all.0 -
getmore4less wrote: »Numerous links say that for confirmation in Scotland majority is the default.
The only reference I found for E&W was the estates act that seems to require agreement by all.
You may indeed be right and I will try and get a definitive answer over this after the bank holiday. A number of sites online would suggest in Scotland that the will needs to specify that they want the executors to work as one. On the point that in England and Wales the opposite takes effect this is of course only so if all executors are taking an active role in the affairs. Where power reserved as been granted this of course would not occur unless they chose to step in.
On another note and separate from the OP whilst doing some digging I have noted that advice being given by some about who owns what after a death with will is wrong. We have been saying that the beneficiaries own the items immediately. I have just found a legal page which actually states what I have said on numerous occasions that the property only becomes theirs when the executors pass it to them
http://www.willans.co.uk/files/uploads/download/Willans_guidelines_for_executors.pdf
Rob0 -
On another note and separate from the OP whilst doing some digging I have noted that advice being given by some about who owns what after a death with will is wrong. We have been saying that the beneficiaries own the items immediately. I have just found a legal page which actually states what I have said on numerous occasions that the property only becomes theirs when the executors pass it to them
http://www.willans.co.uk/files/uploads/download/Willans_guidelines_for_executors.pdf
Rob
I think you are still confusing legal owner from beneficial owner.
Has anyone has suggested the legal owners are any other than the trustees of the estate?0 -
Not confusing anything Getmore. The fact is beneficial owner doesnt give them the right to do anything with it until the executors assign that benefit/gift to them.
No I cant remember anyone suggesting that but I have seen enough comments stating yes you can sell this and that as you are the beneficial owner. The fact is beneficial owner gives the legatee no rights to do anything with the gift until the executor/trustees have passed it to them.
Rob0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards