We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
In Private Rental, Owner wants to move back into his house
Comments
-
OP, it sounds like you're being !!!!!!!!ted by both the LL and the LA. Certainly do not pay for a section 21 that would be madness. Just carry on as normal whilst keeping an eye out for another place to rent. Then you can serve notice and leave these clowns behind.
(A section 8.1 can be served if the LL wants to return to the property to use as their home.)0 -
It should be pointed out that S8G1 is a discretionary route, unlike an S21. Which means the judge gets to exercise discretion over whether to award it or not. It can be defended, is not a reliable method, and so used quite rarely as it infrequently makes sense to serve it instead of a S21.0
-
Not so. See hereprinceofpounds wrote: »It should be pointed out that S8G1 is a discretionary route, unlike an S21. Which means the judge gets to exercise discretion over whether to award it or not. It can be defended, is not a reliable method, and so used quite rarely as it infrequently makes sense to serve it instead of a S21.
SCHEDULE 2 Grounds for Possession of Dwelling-houses let on Assured Tenancies
Part I Grounds on which Court must order possession
Ground 1
....0 -
But the judge still needs to decide whether it is just and equitable.
It is not open and shut.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
The judge has to decide if the conditions relating to S8 ground 1 have been met.But the judge still needs to decide whether it is just and equitable.
It is not open and shut.
Just as he would have to decide if the conditions relating to a S21 (eg deposit protection) have been met.
Provided the conditions are met, the judge has no discretion with either a S21 or a S8 (1).0 -
Thank you all so much for your comments, knowledge and advice. It all pretty much confirms what I have understood from the gentleman at the council housing needs office - so I do feel more confident about that.
The 'eviction' letter doesn't refer in any way to S21, S8, or the housing act at all.
I do have a receipt for the deposit being put into the proper type of trust account - I will dig it out and look at it - but I do believe it's in the Agency's name - as the owner of the house had talked about the agency needing to transfer it to him if he fired them.
It's hard to tell the real reason that the owner wants us to move - does he want to move in? Does he want to revert to renting it room by room as a shared house (which my neighbours will hate if he does it again!), does he want to sell the house? Does he want to raise the rent? Who knows - I don't believe either the owner or the agent anymore!
Thanks again - your help is much appreciated
0 -
oh, I haven't spoken with the home owner recently. He still uses our address for his mail - which I notice recently I'm getting alot of mail for him, his mum and dad from HMRC, DWP etc. Any mail for him I put in a mail box he installed outside the front door which he comes and gets. He used to call first, check to see if any issues needed seeing to, and then come and get his mail. The last couple of weeks he has simply come and gotten his mail, no call, no knock on door as previous. I'm not complaining - but I'm quite certain he is aware of what is going on - and knows he's messing me about hence not talking to me.0
-
The reason is irrelevant: if he wants you out, he will get you out.
Depending on the situation (fixed term, deposit, etc) you may be in a good position to negotiate.
That would be the best course of action for you.0 -
Thank you

I have had a text message from the letting agent today, stating that he has set a meeting between himself, the owner and myself for thursday morning. He is fully aware that I'm out of town this week for work, so have had to reschedule. Next available date is May 2nd for us all to get together. He says that the meeting is to sort the Section 21 notice - and give that to me.
Am I correct in assuming that on may 2nd, if he's giving me the notice that day, that it will have to be for two full calendar months notice ie, my rental date is the first of the month. So giving this to me on the 2nd of the month, will mean that it is not starting the two months until june 1st, and so I will be seen to have until August 1st to vacate the premises? I'm thinking that he is just going to backdate the notice - but I'm sure that the council will not accept that as they are fully aware that the landlord has not issued one.
The Section 21 is required by teh council to award points to help me get a council house if nothing is available privately.0 -
AnxiousMum wrote: »Thank you

Am I correct in assuming that on may 2nd, if he's giving me the notice that day, that it will have to be for two full calendar months notice ie, my rental date is the first of the month. So giving this to me on the 2nd of the month, will mean that it is not starting the two months until june 1st,
2 full calender months from May 2nd is July 1st
and so I will be seen to have until August 1st to vacate the premises? That is two tenancy periods. See below I'm thinking that he is just going to backdate the notice - but I'm sure that the council will not accept that as they are fully aware that the landlord has not issued one.
The Section 21 is required by teh council to award points to help me get a council house if nothing is available privately.
If he serves a [FONT="] S21(1)(b) it is 2 calender months.
[/FONT]
If he serves a [FONT="] S21(4)(a) it is 2 tenancy periods.
See
[/FONT]Ending/Renewing an AST (what happens when the Fixed Term ends?)(What is a Periodic Tenancy?)(How can a LL remove a tenant?)(How can a tenant end a tenancy?)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
