Complaining about a charity

hairydogboy

hollydays wrote: »

Two new posters from the charity, neither of whom can spell..
Slightly obvious..

I am not involved with any charity I have just been reading the posts

ThumbRemote

kazzah60 wrote: »

well - on first reading the rather VAGUE query by the OP I did initially feel some concern for the charity concerned, believing that possibly the OP simply had a gripe about the charity which was unfounded.

I therefore gave what I perceived to be some fairly innocuous information about Charity trustees and their roles.

I now feel entirely behind the OP 100% - I have NOT encouraged people to try and "destroy" the good name of a charity - indeed until the "charity" posted - I had NO idea what the furore was about.

The comments left on this forum FROM representatives of this Charity tell me MUCH more about them and their actions than ANYTHING the OP posted

and the impression the representatives of the charity have left me with is one of extremely poor management and even poorer judgment.

Bad show Charity - now we ALL know what this is about - which is something YOU have created

I agree that the actions of the charity are poor.

However, from what is written, it appears that the OP actually has no issue with the management of the charity at all. They only have an issue over a particular action, which appears to be a matter of contract or civil law and nothing to do with the governance of the charity.

hollydays

hairydogboy wrote: »

I am not involved with any charity I have just been reading the posts

And just happened to sign up today and just happen to have the word dog in your username...

hollydays

hollydays wrote: »

Here's the question- nobody named the charity or the facts of the case which it appears to me are sensitive . So why have you?

Still waiting for an answer to this question..

hollydays

[TEXT DELETED BY FORUM TEAM]

What a joke, talk about twisting things! You've told a good portion of the story WITHOUT BEING ASKED you had no need to do that unless to try to gain the moral high ground . It was extremely unprofessional
And you have failed as a charity by doing so.

Why would anyone deal with you now knowing how vindictive you can be?

hollydays

Of all the charity workers I've met-animal ones are the ones the most up themselves.they paint themselves as great heroes yet they don't really seem to like people-they use this an excuse to disrespect people - they are not better than everyone else.

Hintza

The OP has gone awfully quiet!

Hollydays perhaps you should get off your high horse, you don't know the whole story and personal information has not been given.

hollydays

I agree. But the stuff that's been posted didn't have to be,I assume we do now know the charity name, which does in itself fact give up a lot of information.

pelirocco

hollydays wrote: »

I agree. But the stuff that's been posted didn't have to be,I assume we do now know the charity name, which does in itself fact give up a lot of information.

And does knowing the charity name make you any the wiser who the OP is ?


I find it odd that the OP doesn't dispute the charity decision

hollydays

It may mean something to other people-clearly not me as I've never met him