VCS Spanked in Court Today

bob?_3-2

Coupon-mad wrote: »

No it was deferred again and the date is...secret...! :cool:

You can tell us we won't tell anybody:)

4consumerrights

This is why forum regulars continually help to fight parking companies and will continue to do so.

Computersaysno

I presume a post has been deleted prior to 4cons??

bod1467

No. It was a bumped post in "retaliation" to the MSE sticky about PPC's having "pet lips" about the success of this forum in beating them.

Nenen

torontoboy45 wrote: »

IIRC the deferred date for the Cambridge case is tomorrow.

Please could someone explain what the 'Cambridge Case' is and why it is so important? I have just received a PC in Cambridge myself so am keen to know more about this. Thank you.

bod1467

Pointless typing it all out.

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/cambridge-report-morning-session.html

The result is awaited.

For help with YOUR case, please start your own new thread. But first check out the NEWBIES sticky.

Stroma

bod1467 wrote: »

Pointless typing it all out.

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/cambridge-report-morning-session.html

The result is awaited.

For help with YOUR case, please start your own new thread. But first check out the NEWBIES sticky.

Don't forget the afternoon session

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/cambridge-report-afternoon-session.html

bod1467

I thought that would be obvious once they got there.

bazster

http://www.thestar.co.uk/features/action-desk/victory-for-sheffield-woman-in-parking-battle-1-6611897

An excellent report which doesn't even mention the "f" word.

Even though bargepole mentioned it in his first post I hadn't noticed the size of this claim. It seems the estimable Ms. Finn may have been deliberately goading SRS, who is now out-of-pocket by the thick end of £1,000! I guess the nags will be on short rations for a week or two!

HO87

bazster wrote: »

http://www.thestar.co.uk/features/action-desk/victory-for-sheffield-woman-in-parking-battle-1-6611897

An excellent report which doesn't even mention the "f" word.

Even though bargepole mentioned it in his first post I hadn't noticed the size of this claim. It seems the estimable Ms. Finn may have been deliberately goading SRS, who is now out-of-pocket by the thick end of £1,000! I guess the nags will be on short rations for a week or two!

...and the yacht won't be getting its bottom scraped before the summer.

I surprised not to have heard that the normally voluble Mr R-S hadn't likened the judge in this case to the inestimable Deputy District Judge Lateef (From Martin Cutt's win at Stockport) who he thought, if memory serves, was "...an embarrassment to the judicial system".

I wonder if Mr R-S's seeming disdain for judges who don't find in his favour was ever conveyed to Judge McIlwaine? Perhaps that was why he was summoned to Scun.thorpe?

One really does wonder why SR-S continues to flog a dead horse by putting these matters before judges who can clearly see right through the standard PPC prestidigitation? I suppose he can't be seen not to step up to the plate and support what PE are doing given that he sits on the BPA AOS Board but having to leave the yacht's bottom unscraped. I mean what is the world coming to?