We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
VCS Spanked in Court Today
Options
Comments
-
I love it, they ticket someone whose IQ is probably higher than the entire VCS/Excel staff combined!
Next it'll be a QC or an MP or a Lord, and then it'll really be popcorn time!Je suis Charlie.0 -
Just like Betty Boothroyd and the clampers.What part of "A whop bop-a-lu a whop bam boo" don't you understand?0
-
Unless I am mistaken, Mr Roger Davey is a barrister. They already have snagged the son of a Judge, but I think that that was swatted at Popla.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
-
Well done !
Having won our case on a completely different issue (having your photo taken going into and out of a car park doesn't actually constitute parking), I'm interested in all the stuff that seems to be buzzing round the County Courts at the moment. On the face of it (or, as my cheap book on legal process say's, prima facia), it would seem that the Judiciary seem to absolutely detest what parking companies are bringing to their Courtrooms, and agree on one thing-these charges aren't legal. They seem to be bending over backwards to establish that. My concern is, they all seem to be bending different ways.
The Cambridge case seemed to get "knobbled." What is the precedent that is trying to be set ?Illegitimi non carborundum:)0 -
That's the trouble with the County Court. With no precedent from the higher courts it's open to each individual judge to decide matters however he sees fit.
However, since news of the Cambridge case has reached Sheffield one can assume it has spread nationwide and, whilst the Cambridge case (when it is eventually heard) cannot set a precedent in any formal or legal sense, presumably it can establish some principles which District Judges nationwide can take as guidance.Je suis Charlie.0 -
My God that must have been cheap. I'd no idea the Romans used a phrase to describe the primary cornice on a building and we adopted it for legal purposes.Ivor_Pecheque wrote: »...or, as my cheap book on legal process say's, prima facia
That'll be prima facie, then.
My very sincere apologies for those hoping to request off-board assistance but I am now so inundated with requests that in order to do justice to those "already in the system" I am no longer accepting PM's and am unlikely to do so for the foreseeable future (August 2016).
For those seeking more detailed advice and guidance regarding small claims cases arising from private parking issues I recommend that you visit the Private Parking forum on PePiPoo.com0 -
I just hope nobody came along at night with a tin of red paint, and graffiti'd the cornice with the words Romanes Eunt Domus ...... I'd no idea the Romans used a phrase to describe the primary cornice on a building ...
I have been providing assistance, including Lay Representation at Court hearings (current score: won 57, lost 14), to defendants in parking cases for over 5 years. I have an LLB (Hons) degree, and have a Graduate Diploma in Civil Litigation from CILEx. However, any advice given on these forums by me is NOT formal legal advice, and I accept no liability for its accuracy.0 -
"Peoples called Romanes they go the house?"
"Now write it out a hundred times... if its not done by sunrise I'll cut your b4lls off."My very sincere apologies for those hoping to request off-board assistance but I am now so inundated with requests that in order to do justice to those "already in the system" I am no longer accepting PM's and am unlikely to do so for the foreseeable future (August 2016).
For those seeking more detailed advice and guidance regarding small claims cases arising from private parking issues I recommend that you visit the Private Parking forum on PePiPoo.com0 -
That's the trouble with the County Court. With no precedent from the higher courts it's open to each individual judge to decide matters however he sees fit.
However, since news of the Cambridge case has reached Sheffield one can assume it has spread nationwide and, whilst the Cambridge case (when it is eventually heard) cannot set a precedent in any formal or legal sense, presumably it can establish some principles which District Judges nationwide can take as guidance.
IIRC the deferred date for the Cambridge case is tomorrow. I was tempted to go along for some popcorn time but then it occurred that court space is limited and I'd only be clogging up a seat to the exclusion of a savvier member of the public (bargepole, PP, etc).0 -
torontoboy45 wrote: »IIRC the deferred date for the Cambridge case is tomorrow. I was tempted to go along for some popcorn time but then it occurred that court space is limited and I'd only be clogging up a seat to the exclusion of a savvier member of the public (bargepole, PP, etc).
No it was deferred again and the date is...secret...! :cool:PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards