We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Parking Eye Lose in Court Again
Comments
-
As we all know, decisions in the County Court do not set a precedent, but at the rate ParkingEye are going they will achieve the same effect by p*****g off at least one judge in every County Court in the land.Je suis Charlie.0
-
The LPC rep in our case, rather surprisingly, didn't seem to grasp the concepts of parking / contract law.
Thankfully, the Judge did :-)Illegitimi non carborundum:)0 -
spacey2012 wrote: »It is always a good idea to ask who at court is representing the actual landowner in the case.
Given the stupidity of the lawyers they send from the agency of unemployable lawyers they will problly pipe up " I am" at which you can ask can they prove right of audience by way of documentation, contract or other.
By now, they are about "in it" as far as they can get.
You have lost me there, Suely if a solicitor has rights of audience, he has right of audience? Why is whom he is representing pertinent?You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0 -
You have lost me there, Suely if a solicitor has rights of audience, he has right of audience? Why is whom he is representing pertinent?
I assumed he meant standing rather than actual right of audience, i.e. is the legal rep actually authorised by the land owner to appear on his behalf.0 -
You have lost me there, Suely if a solicitor has rights of audience, he has right of audience? Why is whom he is representing pertinent?
Because you can't just rock up at a court and claim to be representing someone if you haven't been instructed by that party. LPC Law = instructed by ParkingEye. Not instructed by landowner.Je suis Charlie.0 -
I think that you have the wrong end of the stick there, from my reading, right of audience pertains to the solicitor not the client.
I would be inclined not to raise this in front of a judge.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0 -
If a lawyer or advocate claims in court to be representing a party who he clearly is not representing then I would have though that should most certainly be brought to the judge's attention. Whether the term "right of audience" is used would seem of minor significance.Je suis Charlie.0
-
Whether the term "right of audience" is used would seem of minor significance.
That of course depends on how much value you put on accuracy.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0 -
Or how much value you put on pedantry.Je suis Charlie.0
-
There is no pedantry here, only an internet lawyer mis-advising others about how to conduct themselves in a court of law.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards