PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Freeholder trying to charge for work he did himself?

Options
We live in a leasehold flat (freeholder lives in upstairs flat, we're on ground floor).

Last year he sanded down and repainted the outer front door, and in the accounts and fees he's asking us for nearly £300 for that work. Obviously we don't mind paying the cost of the paint, but we can't imagine that he's permitted to charge us for his own labour. As my husband said, if he'd hired a painter who charged £300, we'd pay £150 under terms of our lease of £200 if the painter charged £400 etc, so why should we pay all of it for him doing it?

Comments

  • Boyley
    Boyley Posts: 42 Forumite
    Shouldn't this cost be covered by your service fee, which you presumably pay to the freeholder?
  • Mallotum_X
    Mallotum_X Posts: 2,591 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Doesn't seem un-reasonable to charge for his labour, but as he's not a professional painter, without any of the overheads etc then this rate should be something far more reasonable. For a DIY job £100 including paint would be more appropriate, that would then be split 50-50.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You are paying half of it. He's "charging" £600 for the job...

    I'd agree that it's eminently reasonable for him to be paid for doing the work - with the freehold accounts showing the full cost, apportionment per leaseholder, and that he's paid that much to do it - but £600 to paint a door...? What colour would you like, I'm on me way!
  • societys_child
    societys_child Posts: 7,110 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 28 March 2014 at 6:02PM
    we can't imagine that he's permitted to charge us for his own labour
    Quite possibly he can. What does it say in you're lease? He's entitled to charge the going rate, why should he work for nothing?
    why should we pay all of it for him doing it?
    Because he's the freeholder! ( If the lease says costs are shared then £600 seems a bit steep)


    Boyley wrote: »
    Shouldn't this cost be covered by your service fee, which you presumably pay to the freeholder?
    Presumably, there is no service charge. Quite normal in the situation described.
  • cattie
    cattie Posts: 8,841 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I've owned a few leasehold properties, though usually with a managing agent rather than direct contact with freeholder. I do have a share of freehold of the current property I own.

    I don't see anything wrong with freeholder charging for labour & materials if he is doing work that saves getting a professional in. However, cost does need to be reasonable to my mind. Definitely no more than an experienced painter/decorator would charge, otherwise what's the point in getting his own hands dirty if not to make a nice profit?
    The bigger the bargain, the better I feel.

    I should mention that there's only one of me, don't confuse me with others of the same name.
  • jimbog
    jimbog Posts: 2,255 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    What about taking photos of the door and ask some local painters to quote for painting it - then that would give you some leaverage
    Gather ye rosebuds while ye may
  • cloo
    cloo Posts: 1,291 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Interesting, jimbog.

    I think the lease says we pay half of costs incurred, but there's a question as to whether self declared charge like that can count.

    TBH, I don't mind about just paying for it myself, as we're selling up this year anyway, so there's not an issue about 'letting him do that', which is kind of my husband's issue. But he'd like something concrete to say to him about it if poss.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    cloo wrote: »
    I think the lease says we pay half of costs incurred, but there's a question as to whether self declared charge like that can count.

    'course it does.

    Think of him wearing different hats.

    When he's incurring costs on the freehold - whether by doing work himself or contracting somebody - he wears the hat with a big F - Freeholder - on it. Those costs are incurred by the freeholder, and are paid for by all leaseholders equally.

    One of those leaseholders is you. The other one is him. You each have a hat with a big L on it, and he wears his to pay his half of the bill he wrote whilst wearing the hat with an F on it.
  • The law that requires a freeholder to consult leaseholders before carrying out works which will cost any individual leaseholder more than £250. It’s referred to as a ‘Section 20’ consultation.

    The principle is that the freeholder should inform you of their intention to carry out work, get estimates for the work and justify their reason for giving a contractor the work.

    If there is a dispute about whether or not your landlord has acted in accordance with the ‘Section 20’ consultation process, the matter can be referred to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) for a determination.

    Whilst I would always encourage freeholders and leaseholders to discuss any issues and come to an agreement without going to tribunal or court, it’s handy to have this bit of landlord/tenant law behind you during any discussion.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.