We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

"Temporary" S&S ISA for 13/14 and 14/15 50% allowance

245

Comments

  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 19,256 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I posted this in the other thread but I don't understand why you'd be prepared to take the very high risk that your money in a S&S ISA might have dropped in 3 months but not take the much lower risk that your money is there after 5 years or more.

    Surely keeping it in a S&S ISA long term would make much more sense? Why not just use a S&S ISA anyway and put some low risk investments into it? Hopefully the new allowance may open some eyes about the potential options available rather than just sticking to cash.

    Or be thankful that in the next tax year you can now put £15k into a cash ISA not the £5k that you'd originally expected.

    Far better in my mind to get 5% on a taxable account than 1.5% on an ISA. Even after paying tax you are way better off, picking a tax free option purely because it is tax free just seems crazy.
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
  • bob_100
    bob_100 Posts: 33 Forumite
    jimjames wrote: »
    I posted this in the other thread but I don't understand why you'd be prepared to take the very high risk that your money in a S&S ISA might have dropped in 3 months but not take the much lower risk that your money is there after 5 years or more.

    Surely keeping it in a S&S ISA long term would make much more sense? Why not just use a S&S ISA anyway and put some low risk investments into it? Hopefully the new allowance may open some eyes about the potential options available rather than just sticking to cash.

    Or be thankful that in the next tax year you can now put £15k into a cash ISA not the £5k that you'd originally expected.

    Far better in my mind to get 5% on a taxable account than 1.5% on an ISA. Even after paying tax you are way better off, picking a tax free option purely because it is tax free just seems crazy.
    There is no risk if you just hold it as cash in the S&S ISA until July. Only reason this is being considered is that we can have 20k in the tax wrapper rather than 15k
  • Archi_Bald
    Archi_Bald Posts: 9,681 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    bob_100 wrote: »
    There is no risk if you just hold it as cash in the S&S ISA until July. Only reason this is being considered is that we can have 20k in the tax wrapper rather than 15k

    Yes there is risk.

    The S&S newbies who have asked about this "scheme" are quite obviously unaware of how S&S ISAs work and what charges they will incur for opening, keeping, exiting, and closing the S&S ISA.

    Also, even if you did find a broker that does not currently levy an exit/closing/keeping charge, there are enough days between April 5 and July 1 for them to announce a change in terms and conditions that could result in you getting stung with unexpected charges.

    They could also enforce the current rules (http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/isa/isa-guidance-notes.pdf) and return your money to you. I believe this risk is small, and it wouldn't materially disadvantage you.

    But the risk of charges, including currently unannounced ones, is very real.
  • bob_100
    bob_100 Posts: 33 Forumite
    Archi_Bald wrote: »
    Yes there is risk.

    The S&S newbies who have asked about this "scheme" are quite obviously unaware of how S&S ISAs work and what charges they will incur for opening, keeping, exiting, and closing the S&S ISA.

    Also, even if you did find a broker that does not currently levy an exit/closing/keeping charge, there are enough days between April 5 and July 1 for them to announce a change in terms and conditions that could result in you getting stung with unexpected charges.

    They could also enforce the current rules (http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/isa/isa-guidance-notes.pdf) and return your money to you. I believe this risk is small, and it wouldn't materially disadvantage you.

    But the risk of charges, including currently unannounced ones, is very real.
    I doubt that will happen seeing as many funds use no exit fees/low fees as a selling point. Even if they do propose fees which you do not expect, they will give you notice in which you will have time to immediately transfer the money into your current account and not incur these "extra" fees
  • Archi_Bald
    Archi_Bald Posts: 9,681 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    OK, I rest my case and wait for the posts in July, or even after July, screaming blue murder about the charges people have to pay, or had subtracted from their deposits.
  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 19,256 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 20 March 2014 at 9:49PM
    bob_100 wrote: »
    I doubt that will happen seeing as many funds use no exit fees/low fees as a selling point. Even if they do propose fees which you do not expect, they will give you notice in which you will have time to immediately transfer the money into your current account and not incur these "extra" fees

    Ok, let's assume you realise the difference between fund fees and platform fees and decide to go ahead with this.

    My question is - what is the point? There seems to be an obsession with having something tax free regardless of whether it is the best return or not.

    You'll get 0% interest for 4 months, potentially £25 closure fees. And all to earn 2% tax free when you can get 5% taxed. Surely this is a classic case of the tail wagging the dog

    http://www.evansmockler.co.uk/personal/planning-aspects/tax-planning-dont-let-tail-wag-dog
    Archi_Bald wrote: »
    OK, I rest my case and wait for the posts in July, or even after July, screaming blue murder about the charges people have to pay, or had subtracted from their deposits.

    Probably much the same whining that accompanied the Royal Mail sale from people who had opted to buy the shares via their entire ISA allowance but only got the basic allocation moaning that they didn't want the risk of buying shares. So why did they put all their money in a S&S ISA!!
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
  • bob_100
    bob_100 Posts: 33 Forumite
    jimjames wrote: »
    Ok, let's assume you realise the difference between fund fees and platform fees and decide to go ahead with this.

    My question is - what is the point? There seems to be an obsession with having something tax free regardless of whether it is the best return or not.

    You'll get 0% interest for 4 months, potentially £25 closure fees. And all to earn 2% tax free when you can get 5% taxed. Surely this is a classic case of the tail wagging the dog

    But you are thinking short term. I'm thinking long term. If i get 1.6% per annum (best easy access right now) based on the £5780, that will give me £92 this year. However when interest rates do rise in the coming years (hopefully going up the previous heights of 6%). The £5780 extra i can invest now will give me an extra £350 a year.

    Even if for 4 months i miss out on interest that works out as £30 (based on 1.6% above), hardly much.

    For short term i understand your argument, but for longer terms the gains will be much greater.
  • intalex
    intalex Posts: 1,138 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I totally agree with Bob on this - the addition of an extra £5760 to the tax-free wrapper surely has some value to many individuals.

    For me, I would say it's worth up to a £50 up-front cost including the opportunity cost on interest lost over 3 months.

    Besides, which bank today gives a 5% rate on £5760?
  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 19,256 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    bob_100 wrote: »
    But you are thinking short term. I'm thinking long term. If i get 1.6% per annum (best easy access right now) based on the £5780, that will give me £92 this year. However when interest rates do rise in the coming years (hopefully going up the previous heights of 6%). The £5780 extra i can invest now will give me an extra £350 a year.

    Even if for 4 months i miss out on interest that works out as £30 (based on 1.6% above), hardly much.

    For short term i understand your argument, but for longer terms the gains will be much greater.

    But surely if the limit is now £15k compared to £5k that it was before then it makes even more sense to maximise your return now rather than some potential return at some future date as you can get an extra £10k (£20k as a couple) into cash ISAs each year.

    You have no way of knowing when interest rates may increase and actually be better inside an ISA - it could be 5 or 10 years away, we just don't know. That to me seems a big risk to take and you seem to be focused on the tax break not the best return even long term especially when it is only £5k that is easily absorbed via the proper route in future.
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 19,256 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    intalex wrote: »
    I totally agree with Bob on this - the addition of an extra £5760 to the tax-free wrapper surely has some value to many individuals.

    For me, I would say it's worth up to a £50 up-front cost including the opportunity cost on interest lost over 3 months.

    Besides, which bank today gives a 5% rate on £5760?

    As a Moneysaving site I find it incredible that you're prepared to pay out £50 and lose interest purely to get a tax wrapper than pays less interest than outside when we have no idea when rates will rise again.

    5% is available with Nationwide & TSB. Personally I'd prefer to pay tax on 5% than get 1.6% tax free, George Osborne must love me:)
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.