Adult minimum wage to rise by 19p per hour

145791012

Comments

  • Kernow666
    Kernow666 Forumite Posts: 3,480
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker I've been Money Tipped!
    Forumite
    i have been on just over minimum wage for last 3 years and as i dont work enough hours i dont get tax credits or anything been a single person
    on the other hand i dont pay no tax on my earnings only NI so basically its all mine what i earn
    "If I know I'm going crazy, I must not be insane"
  • Butterfly_Brain
    Butterfly_Brain Forumite Posts: 8,862
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Post of the Month
    Forumite
    tomtontom wrote: »
    NMW is more than sufficient to live on outside London and the south.

    No it isn't, we have to scrape by every month and dread any unexpected bills. DH had to take the only job that was on offer when he was made redundant and now earns less than half of what he used to.
    It is not because he is unskilled, it is because the jobs are not there
    Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones that let in the light
    C.R.A.P R.O.L.L.Z. Member #35 Butterfly Brain + OH - Foraging Fixers
    Not Buying it 2015!
  • Butterfly_Brain
    Butterfly_Brain Forumite Posts: 8,862
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Post of the Month
    Forumite
    tomtontom wrote: »
    Then they can either find a second job or improve their skills set. There is plenty of low paid work available for those that are willing. I don't know anyone that has been out of work for more than a month in recent years.



    It is a bad idea because it gives a false baseline. Those at the bottom of the pile have no incentive to improve themselves, and those a few levels higher are demotivated because those less capable are getting the same pay as them. People should earn what they are worth, and not everyone is worth NMW.

    What part of there are not enough jobs to go around can you not grasp and don't give me tory bull about inmmigrants finding work because most are exploited by employers who pay them less than minimum wage, use gangmasters and charge extortionate rents.
    Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones that let in the light
    C.R.A.P R.O.L.L.Z. Member #35 Butterfly Brain + OH - Foraging Fixers
    Not Buying it 2015!
  • duchy
    duchy Forumite Posts: 19,511
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker Xmas Saver!
    Forumite
    Well. you must have lived like a monk or nun.

    Or rent free with parents
    I Would Rather Climb A Mountain Than Crawl Into A Hole

    MSE Florida wedding .....no problem
  • BillJones
    BillJones Posts: 2,187 Forumite
    No it isn't, we have to scrape by every month and dread any unexpected bills. DH had to take the only job that was on offer when he was made redundant and now earns less than half of what he used to.
    It is not because he is unskilled, it is because the jobs are not there

    Are you both doing a decent amount of hours, though? As I mentioned above, if you each do 60 hours per week, you are getting £40k per year. Yes, 60 hours a week is hard, but it's what I've been doing for twenty years, as have most people around me.
  • furthest
    furthest Forumite Posts: 43 Forumite
    BillJones wrote: »
    Are you both doing a decent amount of hours, though? As I mentioned above, if you each do 60 hours per week, you are getting £40k per year. Yes, 60 hours a week is hard, but it's what I've been doing for twenty years, as have most people around me.

    That is £20,000 before any deductions. £15,000 in reality for a 60 hour week.
  • BillJones
    BillJones Posts: 2,187 Forumite
    furthest wrote: »
    That is £20,000 before any deductions. £15,000 in reality for a 60 hour week.

    No, that's £16,417 after deductions. Each.

    And yes, we discuss gross wages. That's pretty normal when discussing what people earn. It's still a joint salary of £40,000.
  • furthest
    furthest Forumite Posts: 43 Forumite
    BillJones wrote: »
    No, that's £16,417 after deductions. Each.

    And yes, we discuss gross wages. That's pretty normal when discussing what people earn. It's still a joint salary of £40,000.

    With both partners working 60 hour weeks. Most couples have children that need to be brought up. Should they pay for a nanny out of their massive wages?
  • Morlock
    Morlock Posts: 3,265 Forumite
    tomtontom wrote: »
    Then they can either find a second job or improve their skills set.


    It is a bad idea because it gives a false baseline. Those at the bottom of the pile have no incentive to improve themselves, and those a few levels higher are demotivated because those less capable are getting the same pay as them. People should earn what they are worth, and not everyone is worth NMW.

    Those a 'few levels higher' can also take your advice and find a second job or improve their skill set, or does that only work for those on low-pay?
  • BillJones
    BillJones Posts: 2,187 Forumite
    furthest wrote: »
    With both partners working 60 hour weeks. Most couples have children that need to be brought up. Should they pay for a nanny out of their massive wages?

    Yes having only one person working, on the minimum wage, when they've chosen to have children, and need one person to stay home and look after them, is going to mean that you are poor.

    This is why most of us make sure that we can earn more than the minimum wage, and delay having children until we can afford them.

    There's a lesson in there, if you choose to see it, or a class based moan to be vented, if you don't.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 338.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 248.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 447.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 230.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 171K Life & Family
  • 243.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards