We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Can someone satisfy my curiosity?
Comments
-
emissions??????0
-
Because pre-2001 rules work on engine size. Post 2001 is done on emissions. It's a particularly stupid system, in my opinion, and in many cases penalizes the poor, but it's the rules we have.
I assume his engine is more than 1.6 litre, which means his car will be £225 tax. Your car engine size is irrelevant, it's merely categorized by it's emissions and therefore is in a higher tax bracket.
If his car was made after 2001, undoubtedly it would cost more than yours.0 -
No, it's a more efficient engine, husband's old Disco emits rather more.0
-
Hi, yes his is 2495cc whereas mine is 1951cc. Well, thanks for sorting that out for me as it's been bugging me. I had to pay £150 (odd) quid for mine for 6 months, so was feeling a bit surprised!0
-
Yes, different systems for pre- and post-2001 vehicles
https://www.gov.uk/vehicle-tax-rate-tables
When they brought in emissions-based tax rates a grandfather clause was applied to vehicles which had already been registered, so a big old gas guzzler is often significantly cheaper to tax than a big new gas guzzler, even though its emissions and engine size may be greater.0 -
Cheers! Live and learn eh? If it weren't for the fact that we're in the back of beyond in Cornwall I'd get shut of it and get a little Fiat 500 or something but, just not practical.0
-
I have the same issue, my newer, apparently low emission car is £175 a year to tax, whereas my OHs older, clunky over revved thing is miles cheaper!0
-
Yes, different systems for pre- and post-2001 vehicles
https://www.gov.uk/vehicle-tax-rate-tables
When they brought in emissions-based tax rates a grandfather clause was applied to vehicles which had already been registered, so a big old gas guzzler is often significantly cheaper to tax than a big new gas guzzler, even though its emissions and engine size may be greater.
It also means my old but very very fuel efficient and low emissions car costs me £220 to tax (costs £30 if was bought after 2001) and my mums 3 litre TDI costs exactly the same despite being bought after 2001.
It's not a particularly clever tax system. It penalizes the poor in some cases while benefiting the rich in others.0 -
hgotsparkle wrote: »I have the same issue, my newer, apparently low emission car is £175 a year to tax, whereas my OHs older, clunky over revved thing is miles cheaper!
A bit annoying isn't it? Clearly, I know nothing about it but, it doesn't exactly make an incentive for getting rid of your old cars and buying newer.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 261K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
