We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Buying Alcohol at ASDA
Comments
-
Those who want to spend an hour shopping only to walk away and leave it on a futile "point of principle" mustn't value their time much.
It does make me laugh that. The cashier won't have to do it. I saw at one Supermarket several trolley's at the end of the day with a product being put in, someone didn't want/can't afford, can't remember the reason. So basically they build up tonnes of stuff to put back over the course of the day anyway, it's just obviously part of what they're use to and won't care how much there really.
What does make me laugh though is the "well they'll have to put it all back comments" Like I said the cashier won't, whoever does isn't going to give a toss as they don't know the reason why it's there. But the only person who it is going to have an effect on is the person who stormed out, they now have to drive to another Supermarket & start their shop from scratch! So who has really been more inconvenienced?0 -
Those who want to spend an hour shopping only to walk away and leave it on a futile "point of principle" mustn't value their time much.
Perhaps not but it might help Asda's idiotic management to focus their minds on not having such absurd policies.
The situation we have at the moment is that anyone who buys alcohol for under age children will make damn sure that said children are nowhere to be seen when they pick up the alcohol and go through the checkout. The children get their alcohol.
Whereas any adult innocently buying alcohol for their own consumption and thus very likely unaware of the stupid Asda policy is going to all foul of the idiocy.
It's working pretty much back to front. Doing virtually nothing to stop the indirect sale of alcohol to the under age whilst severely pissing off legitimate customersThere are two types of people in the world: Those that can extrapolate information.0 -
My D-I-L was asked for ID in Asda a while back, she's 33, but because she had no ID on her she had to leave to bottle of wine and just paid for the other bits she went for.Retrogamer wrote: »I know people in their 30's who were refused whilst being on their own as they didn't have ID.
At least one of them hasn't aged well either and looks older than they really are so i'd feel sorry if someone at 18 looks like them.
I always wondered what the rules are in regards to selling alcohol to parents with children.
16 = no but i assume they don't mind serving parents who have children in prams or buggies so what's the cut off point?
I have to say though she does look younger than her age but not over 10 years younger.
She has never been stopped in Tesco buying the same item. I think its luck of the draw and how well the till operater is able to judge ages, i'm not very good.Wow, I got 3 *, when did that happen :j:T:p
It is not illegal to open another persons mail unless you intend to commit fraud - this is frequently incorrectly posted
I live in my head - I find it's safer there:p
0 -
Crazy isn't it, I got ID'd in Asda one day, I was 45:o:o:o, silly woman at the till, the self scan it was, I didnt have ID on me, I was buying Fizz and flowers as a gift, so Asdas loss went to Tezzer instead!:DSam B0
-
I'm all for the US system of ID'ing regardless of how old someone looks.
However, being refused alcohol when you have perfectly valid ID because you have a child with you and you are accused of buying it for that child with no reasonable grounds for believing so is absolutely ridiculous.0 -
When did it get so strict?
From 12/13 onwards I never had a problem getting served alcohol. Supermarkets, off-licences, corner shops. None ever asked for ID. This was early 90s.
I've only ever been asked for ID in America.0 -
I once saw this in a Sainsburys, middle-aged woman with a girl no older than five. She had A LOT of shopping and had bought a single bottle of wine with it. Cashier refused to serve her and actually said to the woman 'you might give it to the girl.' Talk about match to a fuse, and I don't blame her. She left all her shopping there and left to almost everyone in the vicinity applauding her.
Good for you - but we only have one supermarket in our town - so it would make life difficult but I would have been tempted to add - Oh no she doesnt drink wine - only whisky. Mind you that would probably mean being reported to social services!0 -
I'm all for the US system of ID'ing regardless of how old someone looks.
Why should we organise our society for the benefit of idiots?
Wasting the time of cashiers and customers on every single transaction just because the occasional dipstick is too stupid to spot that someone is under 25 is plain daft.
It's not as if these rules actually stop any children determined to get their hands on the stuff.There are two types of people in the world: Those that can extrapolate information.0 -
What a stupid policy. Why not just tell the under 18 to go wander off for 5 minutes or wait outside?0
-
The drink aware site says
For an adult to buy or attempt to buy alcohol on behalf of someone under 18. (retailers can reserve the right to refuse the sale of alcohol to an adult if they’re accompanied by a child and think the alcohol is being bought for the child.)
So I'd be asking why they thought my alcohol was being bought for a child
I'm afraid if they ever did this to me I would also leave the shopping at the till. Nothing to do with having too much time, more to do with making a clear point of my disagreement with their interpretation of the law and the unfounded assumptions they have made.
Saying that though, I do all my shopping online and never had an issue with the home delivery and the driver can clearly see kids at home. Maybe this is the way forward for all parents wanting to get their kids hooked on alcohol !0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards