We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Split from Husband...need advice please

1235»

Comments

  • Tigsteroonie
    Tigsteroonie Posts: 24,954 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    You can have all the moral outrage you want. The law is that the assets including pensions are considered joint and will be considered for division between the two parties. Behaviour (unless it's gambling away all the family money) isn't taken into account when calculating that division.

    If you don't like it, then lobby your MP to lobby the Justice system to change the law.
    :heartpuls Mrs Marleyboy :heartpuls

    MSE: many of the benefits of a helpful family, without disadvantages like having to compete for the tv remote

    :) Proud Parents to an Aut-some son :)
  • Georgiegirl256
    Georgiegirl256 Posts: 7,005 Forumite
    You can have all the moral outrage you want. The law is that the assets including pensions are considered joint and will be considered for division between the two parties. Behaviour (unless it's gambling away all the family money) isn't taken into account when calculating that division.

    If you don't like it, then lobby your MP to lobby the Justice system to change the law.

    Totally understand that, and I'm not disputing it, but IMO it doesn't make it right is all I'm saying. 3 years down the line and because the OP's partners ex-wife is claiming then the OP wants to too, seems abit money grabbing to me.
  • brenda10
    brenda10 Posts: 343 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker Mortgage-free Glee!
    Netwizard wrote: »
    If the OP was being beaten up or the hubbie was being an utter !!!!!!, surely the OP would have mentioned this in the post.

    The way its been written, it sounds like OP wants to have her cake and eat it! We can only judge on what has been written and the way the post has been written, the OP doesn't sound like a very nice person. If the OP adds more detail later and it turns out that hunny is a !!!!!!, hence the reason for shagging someone else, I will gladly apologise. (Although in that case, surely its better to end the marriage first, then jump into bed with someone else, not the other way round!)

    The marriage was not WE for her it was I. CONTROLLING NARCISSIST. Read all about a narc! MONEY is their life and PENSION pots also, everything even though they have stolen all the bank account funds because the partner trusted her!
  • harrys_dad
    harrys_dad Posts: 1,997 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    sacha28 wrote: »
    I did say I was working on assumptions so don't get so worked up. I also said that I don't know the history and I was basing my opinions on the very little information provided.

    ...

    And incredibly judgemental opinions they were too. I hate to think what you would have said given all the information.
  • Ms_Chocaholic
    Ms_Chocaholic Posts: 12,761 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    OP - do you have a pension? If so, your ex will be entitled to half in your divorce settlement too.
    Thrifty Till 50 Then Spend Till the End
    You can please some of the people some of the time, all of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time but you can never please all of the people all of the time
  • wssb
    wssb Posts: 48 Forumite
    sacha28 wrote: »
    I did say I was working on assumptions so don't get so worked up. I also said that I don't know the history and I was basing my opinions on the very little information provided.

    I hate finances, root of all evil.

    And, for what it's worth, SHE cheated not him and moved in with someone else. So she isn't homeless either.

    Did you ever think that some parents don't want to just dump their children infull time childcare? I work part time but both myself and husband want our daughter at home with one of us as much as possible.

    Your views on women at home seem a bit warped. How dare you say we don't work for our half of the marital assets, and that's what a pension is. My days at work are almost easier than at home, at least I get breaks their. And it's not usually men that are up most of the night with children who are not well.

    I don't usually post on these but your views really annoyed me. Perhaps you and your husband are happy to leave each others pensions alone, but I guarantee my husband would share his freely if we ever split. Unlike you I think he understands the worth of a woman who puts her career after her children.
  • bugslet
    bugslet Posts: 6,874 Forumite
    edited 7 March 2014 at 9:53AM
    warehouse wrote: »
    Excuse my outrage whilst another ***** does the same to her ex, and even comes on here to wring every drop of blood out of him whilst she's at it fully supported by mumsnet mse users.

    Men can do the same, mine tried until he realised that by not marrying he didn't have the claim on my finances that he would have had, had we married.
    marisco wrote: »
    Personally I don't think there is any excuse or justification for cheating on a partner, regardless of what state a marriage is in. If there are problems address them. If they cant be fixed move on and then start again. An affair is a huge betrayal .

    That's it for me. If you have a problem, try and fix it. If you can't then don't step out with someone else until you've told the first person that it's over.

    We have no idea if the OP was beaten black and blue every day or just got fed up and all the stages in betweeen. However, once you enter into a marriage contract, then various things are decided in advance, that's the point of marriage, it gives you rights and advantages that the non-married don't have. If those rights and advantages don't suit someone later, then you shouldn't have got married, sort out your own agreement about how you split things.
  • Person_one
    Person_one Posts: 28,884 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    wssb wrote: »
    Did you ever think that some parents don't want to just dump their children infull time childcare?

    The choice to work or to be a SAHM parent are equally valid (for the first 4/5 years at least!), there's no need for derogatory language from either side. Parents who work don't 'dump' their children anymore than parents who don't work sit around watching Jeremy Kyle all day.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.