We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Is it legal that the NMW is lower than the benefits cap?

12346»

Comments

  • FBaby
    FBaby Posts: 18,374 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    What needs doing is stop families claiming tax credits working only 24 hours. People shouldn't be sanction if they reduce their hours voluntarily to substitude their wage with tax credits. Tax credits should only be available when one of the partner works full-time when children are under 5 and both working full-time afterwards.
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,713 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    That's the problem. The number and type of jobs that offer NMW or near NMW seems to have increased. It should really be for totally unskilled, low experience, student type employment.

    Something needs to be done. I don't know what.
    That's the problem with any sort of minimum, maximum, limit etc. It soon becomes a target rather than a limit. Like with the 48h max in the working time directive.

    Also in the downturn a lot of companies had wage freezes or very low pay pots - but they had to increase those on NMW in line with NMW increases so that has brought people who were previous paid more than NMW onto the NMW.
  • BigAunty
    BigAunty Posts: 8,310 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    FBaby wrote: »
    What needs doing is stop families claiming tax credits working only 24 hours. People shouldn't be sanction if they reduce their hours voluntarily to substitude their wage with tax credits. Tax credits should only be available when one of the partner works full-time when children are under 5 and both working full-time afterwards.

    Blimey - do you remember when WTC for 2 parents was just 16 hours?! 212,000 2 parent households where one worked just 2 days a week even if their children were teenagers.

    Remember how much outrage and howling there was when it was increased by 8 hours? The cheek, expecting one of the parents to work 3 days a week.....!!
  • bigk77irl
    bigk77irl Posts: 17 Forumite
    Morlock wrote: »
    The Tories 'Make Work Pay' mantra is not about raising wages, but cutting benefits. Of course work will pay if the alternative is nothing.

    "Make Work Pay, Because Something Is Better Than Nothing"


    Surely to make work pay then the benefits cap MUST be lower than the minimum wage? No....slavery still exists with the combo of NMW and Zero hours contract which means employers are using it increasingly more and more to cut ever increasing costs!!!!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.