We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Damage to property during delivery
Options
Comments
-
Thanks. Yes, it's Currys own delivery so it's them I'm taking it up with.
Have rung Barclaycard and they claim section 75 doesn't apply to anything but the goods but have agreed to log it along with the Currys complaint reference. That leaves me open to go back to them if need be.Officially in a clique of idiots0 -
Just persevere, you should get there in the end.
How long have you have the flooring down. The reason I managed to get them to pay for a whole new floor was only because mine had been down for a while and had time to weather naturally so just replacing the damage parts, whilst being extremely difficult, would have made it stand out like a sore thumb.0 -
RedFraggle wrote: »Have rung Barclaycard and they claim section 75 doesn't apply to anything but the goods but have agreed to log it along with the Currys complaint reference
Phone them again and tell them that according to the Financial ombudsman, they are incorrect.
S75 applies to the contract in general and not only the goods and if in completing that contract damage was caused due to negligence, the credit provided has exactly the same liability as the seller of the goods.If you bring a claim under section 75, the most you can get back from the lender is the amount of the credit.
No. Where section 75 applies, it gives the consumer exactly the same claim against the lender as they would have against the supplier of the goods or services, if there were a misrepresentation or a breach of contract by that supplier. This might be more than, or less than, the amount of the credit
transaction - depending on what happened
http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/goods-and-services-bought-with-credit.html0 -
It's been down 2 years. It runs under the skirting boards and the kitchen end panels too (DH does everything properly) so to replace the floor they would have to come up. I'm not overly prescious about the floor. At the end of the day floors are for walking on but it's utter carelessness and looks a mess. I won't let it drop.Officially in a clique of idiots0
-
I sympathise OP but as this appears to happen regularly with deliveries I'm surprised these companies refuse to deliver inside a house.Ask me no questions, and I'll tell you no lies0
-
Rubbish. All wood flooring will dent/mark (as can now be seen in the above post) if there's enough pressure placed on it, regardless of whether it's hardwood or not.
OP, been there, done that, but with Comet back in the day. They wheeled my new fridge freezer on it's castors all the way through my house causing the exact same damage as yours. In the end I got them, well the insurer anyway, to pay for a whole new floor. Was a little bit of hassle to begin with to get the store to admit liability but once up the chain it became easier.
I have a treadmill that weighs a lot more than a fridge freeer that folds up and is pulled along on trolly wheels and it never causes such lines, so no not all hard wood floors are suffering from this problem.0 -
No, I have hardwood floors down and they can easily withstand this kind of traffic, they have done many times.
I have a treadmill that weighs a lot more than a fridge freeer that folds up and is pulled along on trolly wheels and it never causes such lines, so no not all hard wood floors are suffering from this problem.
Looking at the damage it had scrathed into the flooring on one side suggesting either the wheel weren't running or they weren't using it correctly. Either way it is an oak floor and they have caused the damage. There is also a mark on the stone floor in the hallway.Officially in a clique of idiots0 -
RedFraggle wrote: »Looking at the damage it had scrathed into the flooring on one side suggesting either the wheel weren't running or they weren't using it correctly. Either way it is an oak floor and they have caused the damage. There is also a
mark on the stone floor in the hallway.
scrathed as scratched? oak as real oak? stone as real stone?0 -
scrathed as scratched? oak as real oak? stone as real stone?
It shouldn't matter if it was solid oak, oak laminate, or chipboard.
If the trolley was correctly loaded up and both wheels were working properly but overloaded, there should either have been damage caused by two wheels or no damage at all.
Having only one line of damage indicates that one wheel on the trolley was either taking far too much of the load or that it wasn't rotating correctly.
One line of damage could have happened to a single board if it was defective, but to all of them?0 -
They didn't even use a trolley Shaun. They wheeled it on it's castors which are presumably meant for short distance moving not for 12 odd feet. Thanks for your help.Officially in a clique of idiots0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards