We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
ukpc ticket for overstay in drop off zone HELP?
Options
Comments
-
Cut words out where not needed, as shown in bold:
As the registered keeper this is my appeal:
1) The sum is not a genuine pre-estimate of loss.
2) Your signage does not comply with the BPA CoP
3) You are not the landowner and do not have any standing to proceed.
4) PALS have told me UKPC are no longer contracted so you have no authority to chase the above invoice.
If you do reject the challenge and insist on taking the matter further I mustinform you that I may claim my expenses. By continuing to pursue me you agree to pay these costs when I prevail and you agree to provide your full unredacted contract to POPLA.
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Thank you coupon-mad and Bod1467,
I have now emailed UKPC the above appeal, converted word into PDF and attached it to the email, and have received a confirmation, waiting to see what happens next,
As Redx has said it will most probably get rejected, Can any of you help me with the wording for the POPLA appeal, as I cant seem to find a template that I could customise for my situation, I think I've been on the computer most of the day, head is spinning, maybe im missing the templates thread(
0 -
Leave it a few days, to clear your head, then come back and start researching for your POPLA appeal. There are numerous examples, and the NEWBIES thread is again your starting point.0
-
Thank you soo much for all your help.
I will be back in a few days afresh and start researching my POPLA appeal
Thanks so much again.0 -
Here's a starter for your eventual POPLA appeal... do post your draft on here so it can be reviewed before you send it.
[FONT="]Car Reg : xxxxx[/FONT]
[FONT="]Location: : xxxxxx[/FONT]
[FONT="]Date of PCN issue : xxxxxx [/FONT]
[FONT="]PCN Number : xxxxxx[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]POPLA Verification Code: xxxxx[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]Dear POPLA Assessor,[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]I am the registered Keeper of the above vehicle and I'm writing this to appeal a charge sent to me by YYY[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]I would like to appeal this notice on the following grounds: [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]- [FONT="]Charge not a genuine pre-estimate of loss[/FONT]
- [FONT="]Unlawful penalty clause[/FONT]
- [FONT="]No authority to levy charges[/FONT]
- [FONT="]Business Rates & Business Legitimacy[/FONT]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]1. [/FONT][FONT="]Charge not a genuine pre-estimate of loss[/FONT][FONT="][/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]The demand for a payment of £100 is punitive, unreasonable, exceeds an appropriate amount, and has no relationship to the loss that would have been suffered by the Landowner. The YYY signs states that a PCN would be issued for a “failure to comply” with the terms of parking, which indicates that the parking charge represents damages for a breach of the parking contract. [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]Accordingly, the parking charge must be a genuine pre-estimate of loss. YYY has not provided any evidence as to how and why the parking charge is a genuine pre-estimate of loss. Therefore the parking charge is punitive and an unenforceable penalty charge. [/FONT]
[FONT="]
The BPA Code of Practice states:[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]“19.5 If the parking charge that the driver is being asked to pay is for a breach of contract or act of trespass, this charge must be based on the genuine pre-estimate of loss that you suffer.“[/FONT]
[FONT="]and [/FONT]
[FONT="]“19.6 If your parking charge is based upon a contractually agreed sum, that charge cannot be punitive or unreasonable. “[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]I put YYY to strict proof that that their charge represents a genuine pre-estimate of loss. To date YYY have refused to provide me with a detailed breakdown of how the amount of the “charge” was calculated in the form of documented, specific evidence applicable to this car park and this alleged incident. I am aware from Court rulings and previous POPLA adjudications that the cost of running the business For example, were no breach to have occurred then the cost of parking enforcement (for example, erecting signage, wages, uniforms, office costs) would still have been the same and, therefore, may not be included in this pre-estimate of loss.[/FONT]
[FONT="]I therefore respectfully request that my appeal is upheld and the charge dismissed.[/FONT][FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]2. [/FONT][FONT="]Unlawful penalty clause - revenue for YYY[/FONT][FONT="][/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]Since there was no demonstrable loss/damage and yet a breach of contract has been alleged, this 'charge' can only be an unlawful attempt at dressing up a penalty to impersonate a parking ticket, as was found in the case of Excel Parking Services v Hetherington-Jakeman (2008) also OBServices v Thurlow (review, February 2011), in Parking Eye v Smith (Manchester County Court December 2011) and UKCPS v Murphy (April 2012).[/FONT]
[FONT="]This transparently punitive charge by YYY is a revenue-raising exercise and is therefore unenforceable in law. YYY's own website is damning in this regard. [/FONT][FONT="][/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]So this is (as is proven by the Operator's own website) a revenue-raising scheme disguised as a 'parking ticket' - so in fact it is an unenforceable penalty.[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]I therefore respectfully request that my appeal is upheld and the charge dismissed.[/FONT][FONT="][/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]3. [/FONT][FONT="]No authority to levy charges[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]A parking management company will need to have the proper legal authorisation to contract with the consumer on the landowner’s behalf and enforce for breach of contract.[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]YYY must produce evidence to demonstrate that it is the landowner, or a contract that it has the authority of the landowner to issue charge notices at this location. I believe there is no contract with the landowner/occupier that entitles YYY to levy these charges and to pursue these charges in their own name as creditor in the Courts and therefore has no authority to issue charge notices.[/FONT]
[FONT="]
I put YYY to strict proof to POPLA that they have the necessary legal authorisation at this location and I demand that the YYY produce to POPLA the contemporaneous and unredacted contract between the landowner and YYY. Even if a basic contract is produced and mentions PCNs, the lack of ownership or assignment of title or interest in the land reduces any contract to one that exists simply on an agency basis between YYY and the owner/occupier, containing nothing that YYY can lawfully use in their own name as a mere agent, that could impact on a third party customer. [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]It has also been widely reported that some parking companies have provided “witness statements” instead of the relevant contract. There is no proof whatsoever that the alleged signatory on behalf of the landowner has ever seen the relevant contract, or, indeed is even an employee of the landowner. I require, if such a witness statement is submitted, that it is accompanied by a letter, on landowner’s headed notepaper, and signed by a director or equivalent of the landowner, confirming that the signatory is, indeed, authorised to act on behalf of the landowner, has read and the relevant terms of the contract and is qualified to attest to the full limit of authority of the parking company[/FONT]
[FONT="]
I therefore respectfully request that my appeal is upheld and the charge dismissed.
[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]This concludes my appeal.[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]Kind regards[/FONT]
[FONT="][/FONT]
[FONT="][/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="][/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]0 -
Thank you Ezerscrooge,
This is lovely I can adapt it for my circumstances, it was a free drop
zone which the hospital advertise on their website, so there is definitely no loss to
the hospital or ukpc, and I was there as a genuine patient pickup, and
the hospital no longer use ukpc as their parking enforcement so I think
I,ll a good chance at popla I hope.
thanks0 -
The other examples were just as lovely!PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Lol coupon-mad...thanks, I will of course read the rest of the examples
and pick what would be suitable for my position, I will of course post it here
before sending it for your approval :-).0 -
Send it by ordinary post with a free certificate of posting.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards