We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Can you sue a referee?
Options
Comments
-
This would make for an excellent exam question! I agree with Crazy Jamie's analysis, OP if you wish to read further into this the Hillsborough cases would be relevant.0
-
Thank you, TTT. This was not meant to be one of those "WHAT CAN I DO????" type things, but was a situation that gave me cause to think earlier on. I agree that it would be an interesting exam question!
I have been following the Hillsborough enquiries, but perhaps I should follow them further. Regardless, it was a tragedy of the highest order and one that every football fan should acknowledge.One important thing to remember is that when you get to the end of this sentence, you'll realise it's just my sig.0 -
halibut2209 wrote: »I have been following the Hillsborough enquiries, but perhaps I should follow them further. Regardless, it was a tragedy of the highest order and one that every football fan should acknowledge."MIND IF I USE YOUR PHONE? IF WORD GETS OUT THATI'M MISSING FIVE HUNDRED GIRLS WILL KILL THEMSELVES."0
-
A few years ago I would have quite liked to have sued Ferrari in a race Rubens Barrichello was going to win until team orders came in to play on the line!!0
-
Should the ref be sued for not spotting it, or the player who cheated?
Put it another way, if a robber breaks into your house, is he the guilty party, or should the police be blamed?
When Matthew Rees used the illegal ball for a throw in which led to Wales scoring a try (leading to them winning the 6N), where, if he hadn't cheated, Ireland would have won the match and the 6N, is it the ref at fault or the cheating welsh b@$*@rd?
As long as refs get blamed, the cheats will continue to cheat, because they lack morals and have nothing to lose.1. Have you tried to Google the answer?
2. If you were in the other person's shoes, how would you react?
3. Do you want a quick answer or better understanding?0 -
Should the ref be sued for not spotting it, or the player who cheated?
Put it another way, if a robber breaks into your house, is he the guilty party, or should the police be blamed?
When Matthew Rees used the illegal ball for a throw in which led to Wales scoring a try (leading to them winning the 6N), where, if he hadn't cheated, Ireland would have won the match and the 6N, is it the ref at fault or the cheating welsh b@$*@rd?
As long as refs get blamed, the cheats will continue to cheat, because they lack morals and have nothing to lose.
Who cheated?
Mistiming a tackle in the box does not make you a "cheat".This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
Who cheated?
Mistiming a tackle in the box does not make you a "cheat".
Deliberate or accidental? Was it a tackle, a hand ball, a shirt pull, a dive, what?1. Have you tried to Google the answer?
2. If you were in the other person's shoes, how would you react?
3. Do you want a quick answer or better understanding?0 -
A few years ago I would have quite liked to have sued Ferrari in a race Rubens Barrichello was going to win until team orders came in to play on the line!!
I think this is a far better example, where it can easily be shown that the potential to win a bet was completely removed by a team decision, rather than a mistake. In some sports such a decision would be deemed against the rules as "not trying" but the rule change to allow team orders in F1 mean that betting on a result is even more of a lottery than it is in other sports.
Disclaimer: I never bet on F1, although I do occasionally have a flutter on golf, and even more rarely football and horse racing, generally with a complete lack of success.
0 -
I wouldn't say it's better. It's fair to say that there is no recourse for what MAY have happened. But the examples I gave in the OP could be considered provable losses, ie things that DID happen but were incorrectly ruled not to have happenedOne important thing to remember is that when you get to the end of this sentence, you'll realise it's just my sig.0
-
Did the ref fail to see it because of incompetence, positioning, or because football refuses to use video technology, such as is used in tennis, cricket, rugby, motorsports,...1. Have you tried to Google the answer?
2. If you were in the other person's shoes, how would you react?
3. Do you want a quick answer or better understanding?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards