NRP possibly commited crime

HoneyNutLoop

Ok, so you don't really know what evidence the CSA used for the April decision and how it differs from the evidence the Tribunal used. (I.e. You don't know which payslips they specifically used or what caused the income to be lower than the Tribunal's decision)

From the sequence of events you describe, as has been said before, you have no basis in law to get them to complete a review now from Sept 11, which just leaves the April decision. As you don't know all the facts about how the April decision was made, you can't know if there was misrepresentation or if the CSA simply used different evidence than the Tribunal. If you wanted to, you could ask the CSA to check the evidence used in the April decision, in light of the Tribunal decision, to make sure there wasn't any misrepresentation. But you would then have to trust the answer they gave.

As Crellow has said, you are past the absolute legal limit of appeal against the April 2012 decision, which is 13 months in total from when the decision was made or when the CSA first refused to revise that decision.

jacklink

.......................