We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Wrong Estate Agent Advice
Comments
-
richards499 wrote: »35 years where left on Lease0
-
35 years on a lease is practically unsellable, simply because the lease is to short for a lender to even consider the property for mortgage purposes, their advice was sound.
Your problem is trying to pass the cost of the lease on to a buyer, all the buyer see is the price difference betwen your and the house next door.0 -
-
Did the other houses also only have 32 years remaining on the lease? It could be they'd extended the lease, or for other reasons had longer remaining.
Generally speaking, properties with such a short term remaining on the lease only sell at low prices, if they sell at all.0 -
I agree - you would not get a mortgage on a 32 year lease so the house would be unsellable.
Your choices were to either extend the lease or buy the freehold.0 -
jonesMUFCforever wrote: »I agree - you would not get a mortgage on a 32 year lease so the house would be unsellable.
Your choices were to either extend the lease or buy the freehold.
Not unsaleable, just unmortgageable a cash buyer could purchase.
However in most circumstances buying the freehold would in all probability be worthwhile, meaning that the lease price plus the cost of buying the lease would be less than the freehold sale price.
Edit - maybe that's why it's on the credit cards board as it could be bought within the limits of many cards?0 -
Not unsaleable, just unmortgageable a cash buyer could purchase.
However in most circumstances buying the freehold would in all probability be worthwhile, meaning that the lease price plus the cost of buying the lease would be less than the freehold sale price.
Edit - maybe that's why it's on the credit cards board as it could be bought within the limits of many cards?
You are right that no mortgage lender would touch it.0 -
jonesMUFCforever wrote: »Would you then buy a house knowing in 32 years it would be worth nothing to you (unless you purchased the freehold or extended the lease) or worse how would you resell?
You are right that no mortgage lender would touch it.
As with any from of investment the question is for how much.
I remember a house being sold by which had some major electrical gear behind it. The sale was conducted with the full knowledge that at any time the electricity board could come along and demolish the house to gain access. It sold for around 5% of the normal asking price.
Similarly plenty of places being sold on the east coast which will get washed away, whether that happens in a few weeks or a few years is down to many factors.
The best way to look at a short lease is often to work from a typical rental cost and then calculate an internal rate of return with the cost degrading over the length of the lease.0 -
richards499 wrote: »The point I was trying to make was houses with the same time left on the lease are selling and still getting mortgage's, the last one sold got 32years mortgage!
http://www.cml.org.uk/cml/handbook/englandandwales/question-list/321
Your post is about the agent giving you incorrect advice and how worse off you are for it. But as it turns out the agent gave you correct advice.
I hope this puts your mind at ease now.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards