We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Returns not received

13»

Comments

  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    That is not a barcode
    purely a transaction number
    you have no claim with RM.
    Chase up Selfridges stating you have followed their procedures(take a screen grab incase it changes) and expect a refund.
    lesson learned though. for that value. SD all the way
  • nebari
    nebari Posts: 45 Forumite
    I took a screen grab as soon as I had read their T&Cs :)

    I always send things SD, the only reason I didn't this time was that the site told me to print the label and obtain a proof of postage, unless it was > £250 (which it isn't).

    You're right though, in future I will for anything.
  • Proof of postage will state the delivery address and the weight of parcel, which is more than enough should it be needed for a small claims case against the retailer. By bris's logic SD would also be useless - there is still nothing to prove what was in the parcel.
  • hollydays
    hollydays Posts: 19,812 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Interesting thread , good luck OP .
  • nebari
    nebari Posts: 45 Forumite
    Update:

    Hi all, I have had several conversations yesterday and today, the latest call was with a supervisor where I mentioned the DSR, contract between Selfridges and the Post Office etc.

    She told me they would issue me with a voucher, where I pointed out I was entitled to my cash back (this is where I need clarification). At this point she told me that her manager had said this was the only option.

    At this point, I went through everything again, and she is now off to see her manager again, and will get back to me a little later.

    Am I correct, in the statement I made, that I am entitled to my cash back, and do not have to accept a voucher?
  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Yes you're entitled to your money back and shouldnt have to accept a voucher.
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
  • Op can't make a claim, as she didn't pay the postage. The contract is between the retailer and the PO.

    Not entirely relevant to the OP but it would appear the recipient can make a claim although I have read so many times here they cant.

    http://www.royalmail.com/personal/help-and-support/claims-process-for-inland-items

    See When to claim and Next steps

    I became aware of this on another site were an item was damaged in transit by RM.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.